Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
OtherBRAIN

Comparison of Optimized and Standard Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5T for the Detection of Acute Lesions in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack

A. Bertrand, C. Oppenheim, C. Lamy, S. Rodrigo, O. Naggara, J.L. Mas and J.F. Meder
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2008, 29 (2) 363-365; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0802
A. Bertrand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Oppenheim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Lamy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Rodrigo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Naggara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.L. Mas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.F. Meder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: The high rate of normal diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) raises the question as to its sensitivity for detecting small ischemic lesions. We compared standard and optimized DWI in 36 consecutive patients with TIA. Optimized DWI was positive in more patients than standard DWI (19 versus 16; P < .001) and showed more lesions (56 versus 42; P = .002). At 1.5T, optimizing DWI decreases the rate of false-negative DWI in patients with TIA.

Although diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has improved the detection of acute ischemic stroke, false-negatives are not uncommon in small infarction, brain stem location, or imaging performed early after onset.1 Increasing the magnetic field strength allows the detection of additional small bright dots on DWI in stroke patients.2 In these patients, higher sensitivity of DWI for small lesions can also be obtained at 1.5T.3 Given that most patients are still being imaged on 1.5T MR units, our aim was to determine whether these latter results could be replicated in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA).

Technique

MR imaging studies were performed on a 1.5T MR unit (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis). Standard DWI was acquired using a spin-echo single-shot echo-planar sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE, 6400/86.3 ms; FOV, 240 × 240 mm; matrix, 128 × 128 ms; 20 × 24 × 6-mm-thick contiguous sections; NEX = 2; b = 0–1000 mm2/s along 3 diffusion directions; and acquisition time = 51 seconds. Optimized DWI consisted of 40 3-mm-thick sections, acquired using similar parameters except for the following: NEX = 3; diffusion directions = 9; gap = 0.3 mm; and acquisition time = 6 minutes.

This was a retrospective study of patients admitted to a stroke unit during a 4-month period. Fifty-three consecutive patients were referred for clinical suspicion of TIA after the exclusion of patients with isolated amaurosis fugax. Five patients were excluded because of MR contraindication and 4 others because the image quality of either standard or optimized DWI was not diagnostic, due to magnetic susceptibility or motion artifacts. Of the 44 remaining patients, all except 8 underwent standard and optimized DWI during the initial MR examination. The final study group consisted of 36 patients.

After correction of distortions, all of the images were randomly reviewed by 2 readers blinded to the clinical data, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. DWI lesions were defined as hyperintense regions after exclusion of T2 shinethrough effects due to hyperintensities on T2-weighted echo-planar images (b = 0 mm2/s). Cases of discordance between readers were resolved by consensus. For each patient with lesions seen on both DWIs, a region of interest was centered in the largest area of diffusion hyperintensity (region of interest area = 28 ± 18 mm2, mean ± SD) and mirrored on to the contralateral hemisphere to obtain a ratio of signal intensity (rSI) and ADC (rADC). Volume and topography of all of the additional lesions depicted on optimized DWIs were noted.

SPSS 14.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Ill) was used for statistical analysis. Agreements were assessed by calculating the κ coefficient and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for the dichotomous data. After consensus, the number of patients with at least 1 lesion, total number of lesions, rSI, and rADC were compared between standard and optimized DWIs by using Fisher exact test for binary variables, paired Wilcoxon test for the total number of lesions, and Student t test for continuous variables. A value of P ≤ .05 was considered significant.

Results

The 36 patients consisted of 21 men and 15 women (mean age, 66 ± 13 years). The median duration of symptoms was 2 hours and 50 minutes (range, 1 minute to 23 hours). The median delay from onset to MR imaging was 34 hours (range, 3 hours to 8 days), with 13 patients imaged within 12 hours. TIA symptoms were as follows: aphasia (n = 8), motor weakness (n = 18), isolated sensory disturbance (n = 3), other visual deficits (n = 3), brain stem symptoms (n = 3), and cerebellar symptoms (n = 1).

For the distinction between positive and negative DWIs, the 2 readers agreed in all of the cases on optimized DWI, whereas κ = 0.89 (95% CI, 0.73–1.04) for standard DWI. After consensus, a total of 56 lesions on optimized DWI and 42 lesions on standard DWI was identified, with an average of 1.6 versus 1.2 lesions per patient for optimized and standard DWI, respectively (P = .002). The agreement between standard and optimized DWI was κ = 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65–1.40) for the distinction between positive and negative DWI and κ = 0.60 (95% CI, 0.41–0.91) for the number of lesions. None of the lesions seen on standard DWI were missed on optimized DWI. Of the 20 patients with normal standard DWI, 3 had lesions on optimized DWI (Fig 1), 2 of which were imaged within 12 hours from onset. These were frontal or temporal cortical lesions that matched clinical symptoms in 1 patient and displayed a 20% ADC decrease for the 2 others. Overall, optimized DWI improved the detection of at least 1 lesion per patient compared with standard DWI (19 versus 16; P < .001). This remained significant when the analysis was restricted to the patients imaged within 12 hours from onset (P = .02). Of the 16 patients who had recent ischemia identified on standard DWI, 7 had 1–3 additional lesions on optimized DWI, located in the same arterial territory as that seen on standard DWI. Optimized DWI showed 14 additional lesions in 10 patients (Fig 2). These were small (mean ± SD = 45 ± 41 mm3), preferentially located in the cortex (n = 11), and occasionally in brain stem (n = 2) or deep white matter (n = 1). According to the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria, a vascular cause was identified in 10 patients, including 7 patients with a positive standard DWI and 1 with ischemia seen only on optimized DWI. The rSI of ischemic lesions was significantly (P = .002) higher on optimized DWI (1.77 ± 0.60) than on standard DWI (1.54 ± 0.45). The rADC was similar on optimized DWI (0.80 ± 0.19) and on standard DWI (0.82 ± 0.15; P value not significant). In patients imaged within 12 hours from onset, the rSI was still higher on optimized DWI but was no longer significantly different from rSI measured on standard DWI (P = .08).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 59-year-old man referred for aphasia and sensorimotor weakness of the right face and upper limb that lasted 90 minutes. Optimized DWI showed 2 punctate cortical lesions in the left middle cerebral artery territory, not visible on standard DWI. These lesions were located in the left primary sensory motor cortex, corroborating clinical symptoms.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A 51-year-old man referred for ataxia and left facial paresthesia that lasted 20 minutes. Standard DWI demonstrated a subtle punctuate hyperintensity in the brain stem. Optimized DWI confirmed a recent ischemic brain stem lesion and revealed additional bright dots in the right cerebral peduncle, matching clinical symptoms.

Discussion

DWI is becoming an important technique for optimum management of patients with TIA.4 The DWI sequence used in clinical practice covers the brain in less than a minute, which conforms to the time constraints of acutely ill patients with stroke. These constraints, however, are less crucial in patients with TIA, who are occasionally imaged while the deficit has already partially resolved and often after complete regression of neurologic symptoms. Increasing the acquisition time devoted to DWI to improve the detection of small ischemic lesions is, thus, conceivable. We implemented such a DWI sequence by reducing the section thickness by half to minimize the partial volume effect and increasing the number of diffusion directions and the signal intensity average to improve the angular resolution and signal intensity-to-noise ratio. These modifications improved the sensitivity for the detection of recent ischemic lesions in patients with TIA at 1.5T. The additional lesions identified were, without exception, small. We speculate that these lesions were not seen on the corresponding standard DWI because of the lower signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratios, which, together with partial volume averaging of the adjacent normal tissue, precluded the diagnosis on the standard DWI. In our series of 36 patients with TIA, optimized DWI yielded approximately 8% higher sensitivity and allowed 3 patients to receive the diagnosis of acute stroke. This suggests that slight improvement of DWI parameters can result in clinically relevant findings in patients with suspected TIA. Indeed, the presence of a DWI lesion confirms the vascular origin of the deficit and is associated with a greater risk for future stroke and functional dependence.5 We extend to TIAs the results obtained by others in acute stroke patients, with a slightly different optimized DWI sequence on a 1.5T unit.3 Although these authors did not report any stroke patient with bright dots exclusively visible on optimized DWI and normal standard DWI, optimized DWI showed twice as many lesions as standard DWI. In line with our findings, they reported a frequent cortical location of supplementary lesions. We speculate that the high proportion of cortical lesions that we observed may partly be due to the eddy currents distortion correction algorithm that are more accurate when at least 6 diffusion directions are acquired. The relative signal intensity ratio of lesions on optimized DWI was significantly greater than that measured on standard DWI, whereas ADC decrease (∼20%) did not significantly differ on both sequences. This suggests that improving the angular resolution by using 9 instead of 3 diffusion directions does not solve the problems of ADC measurements in very small lesions.

High-field DWI MR improves the detection of small ischemic lesions in subacute stroke. However, image distortions at 3T are substantial and may interfere with diagnosis.2 Until advanced acquisition strategies to reduce geometric distortion are developed and high-field MR imaging systems become widely available, a large proportion of patients with TIA will keep being imaged on 1.5T imaging operating systems and may, thus, benefit from optimized DWI. Optimized DWI may be a useful adjunct when facing a doubtful signal intensity change on standard DWI because of the excellent interobserver agreement that we reported. It may also be the only way to confirm a transient neurologic deficit as being ischemic when standard DWI fails to show acute lesion.

In conclusion, our study suggests that optimization of DWI acquisition parameters at 1.5T increases the sensitivity of DWI for the detection of small ischemic lesions, which are the hallmark of TIA-related lesions.

References

  1. ↵
    Oppenheim C, Stanescu R, Dormont D, et al. False-negative diffusion-weighted MR findings in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1434–40
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Kuhl CK, Textor J, Gieseke J, et al. Acute and subacute ischemic stroke at high-field-strength (3.0-T) diffusion-weighted MR imaging: intraindividual comparative study. Radiology 2005;234:509–16
    PubMed
  3. ↵
    Benameur K, Bykowski JL, Luby M, et al. Higher prevalence of cortical lesions observed in patients with acute stroke using high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1987–89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Kidwell CS, Alger JR, Di Salle F, et al. Diffusion MRI in patients with transient ischemic attacks. Stroke 1999;30:1174–80
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Coutts SB, Simon JE, Eliasziw M, et al. Triaging transient ischemic attack and minor stroke patients using acute magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 2005;57:848–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received May 27, 2007.
  • Accepted after revision July 1, 2007.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 2
February 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Optimized and Standard Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5T for the Detection of Acute Lesions in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Optimized and Standard Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5T for the Detection of Acute Lesions in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack
A. Bertrand, C. Oppenheim, C. Lamy, S. Rodrigo, O. Naggara, J.L. Mas, J.F. Meder
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2008, 29 (2) 363-365; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0802

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Optimized and Standard Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5T for the Detection of Acute Lesions in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack
A. Bertrand, C. Oppenheim, C. Lamy, S. Rodrigo, O. Naggara, J.L. Mas, J.F. Meder
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2008, 29 (2) 363-365; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0802
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Technique
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire