An Automatic Procedure for Normalization of Cerebral Blood Volume Maps in Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast−Based Glioma Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Paulson ES,
   2. Schmainda KM

   . Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors. Radiology 2008;249:601–13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Wetzel SG,
   2. Cha S,
   3. Johnson G,
   4. et al

   . Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study. Radiology 2002;224:797–803

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Emblem KE,
   2. Nedregaard B,
   3. Nome T,
   4. et al

   . Glioma grading by using histogram analysis of blood volume heterogeneity from MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps. Radiology 2008;247:808–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Law M,
   2. Young R,
   3. Babb J,
   4. et al

   . Histogram analysis versus region of interest analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging data in the grading of cerebral gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:761–66

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Lupo JM,
   2. Cha S,
   3. Chang SM,
   4. et al

   . Dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion imaging of high-grade gliomas: characterization of spatial heterogeneity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1446–54

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Otsu NA

   . A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 1979;9:62–66

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Emblem KE,
   2. Due-Tonnessen P,
   3. Hald JK,
   4. et al

   . Automatic vessel removal in gliomas from dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:1210–7

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Boxerman JL,
   2. Schmainda KM,
   3. Weisskoff RM

   . Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:859–67

   Abstract/FREE Full Text