Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleBRAIN

Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts by Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions in Detection of Small Brain Metastasis at 3T MR Imaging: Comparison with Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition of Gradient Echo Imaging

Y. Kato, S. Higano, H. Tamura, S. Mugikura, A. Umetsu, T. Murata and S. Takahashi
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 923-929; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1506
Y. Kato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Higano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Tamura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Mugikura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Umetsu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Murata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Takahashi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A case with brain metastases depicted clearly on SPACE. A, Sagittal image of contrast-enhanced SPACE. B, Sagittal image of contrast-enhanced MPRAGE. The anatomic levels of these images conform. The SPACE image shows numerous small enhancing lesions, whereas only a few lesions with subtle enhancement are barely visible on MPRAGE image. Arrows indicate lesions delineated only on SPACE.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Definition of the regions of interest. A, Contrast-enhanced sagittal SPACE image. B, Contrast-enhanced sagittal MPRAGE image. A circular or oval region of interest for a lesion is as large as possible, excluding lesion edges, to avoid a partial volume effect (solid oval), and the region of interest for the background is on the brain parenchyma near the lesion in the same plane (dotted circle). We defined these regions of interest carefully to avoid CSF or vessels. The size and shape of the region of interest on the brain parenchyma are identical on both SPACE and MPRAGE images.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Results of the ROC analyses. In both observer groups, the Az was significantly higher for SPACE than for MPRAGE. The difference in Az values between the 2 observer groups was smaller for SPACE images. The asterisk in A indicates residents, P = .0001; the dagger in B, neuroradiologists, P = .0013.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    The contrast-enhanced SPACE image (A) clearly reveals an enhancing nodular lesion (arrow), whereas the lesion shows faint enhancement on the contrast-enhanced MPRAGE (B) and is barely visible. This lesion was noted by 9 observers on SPACE, but overlooked by 8 readers on MPRAGE.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Sensitivity and specificity of SPACE and MPRAGE according to the observer groups*

    ResidentsNeuroradiologists
    SPACEMPRAGESPACEMPRAGE
    Sensitivity96.5†59.498.8‡69.4
    (164/170)(101/170)(168/170)(118/170)
    Specificity9088.993.390.6
    (162/180)(160/180)(168/180)(163/180)
    Accuracy93.1§74.696.0¶80.3
    (326/350)(261/350)(336/350)(281/350)
    False-positive1011.16.79.4
    (18/180)(20/180)(12/180)(17/180)
    False-negative3.5‖40.61.2#30.6
    (6/170)(69/170)(2/170)(52/170)
    • Note:—SPACE indicates sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions; MPRAGE, magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo.

    • * Data are percentages; numbers in parentheses are raw data.

    • † P= .0002.

    • ‡ P = .003.

    • § P = .0008.

    • ¶ P = .002.

    • ‖ P = .0002.

    • # P = .01.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Comparison of the sensitivity of the 2 sequences classified by lesion size: results for residents

    Diameter (mm)Sensitivity with SPACE*Sensitivity with MPRAGE*P Value (SPACE vs MPRAGE)
    <595.7 (110/115)50.4 (58/115).0001
    ≥598.2 (54/55)78.2 (43/55).011
    P value (<5 vs ≥5).33.0005
    • * Data are percentages; numbers in parentheses are raw data.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Comparison of the sensitivity of the 2 sequences classified by lesion size: results for neuroradiologists*

    Diameter (mm)Sensitivity with SPACESensitivity with MPRAGEP Value (SPACE vs MPRAGE)
    <598.3 (113/115)60.9 (70/115).003
    ≥5100 (55/55)87.3 (48/55).005
    Pvalue (<5 vs ≥5).18.004
    • * Data are percentages; numbers in parentheses are raw data.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Summary of false-positive events*

    False-Positive EventsSPACE (n = 340)MPRAGE (n = 340)
    Vessels8 (5, 3)29 (17, 12)
    Venous sinus12 (8, 4)1 (1, 0)
    Choroid plexus10 (7, 3)1 (1, 0)
    Infarction0 (0, 0)1 (0, 1)
    Artifacts4 (2, 2)10 (5, 5)
    Total34 (22, 12)42 (24, 18)
    • * Numbers in parentheses are those of false-positive events that occurred for each observer group (residents, neuroradiologists).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 5
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts by Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions in Detection of Small Brain Metastasis at 3T MR Imaging: Comparison with Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisitio…
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts by Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions in Detection of Small Brain Metastasis at 3T MR Imaging: Comparison with Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition of Gradient Echo Imaging
Y. Kato, S. Higano, H. Tamura, S. Mugikura, A. Umetsu, T. Murata, S. Takahashi
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 923-929; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1506

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts by Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions in Detection of Small Brain Metastasis at 3T MR Imaging: Comparison with Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition of Gradient Echo Imaging
Y. Kato, S. Higano, H. Tamura, S. Mugikura, A. Umetsu, T. Murata, S. Takahashi
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 923-929; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1506
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods and Materials
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Improved Lesion Conspicuity with Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1 TSE Black-Blood Imaging in Cranial Neuritis: A Comparative Study of Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1 TSE, 3D T1 Fast-Spoiled Gradient Echo, and 3D T2 FLAIR
  • Usefulness of the Delay Alternating with Nutation for Tailored Excitation Pulse with T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolution in the Detection of Cerebral Metastases: Comparison with MPRAGE Imaging
  • Brain Tumor-Enhancement Visualization and Morphometric Assessment: A Comparison of MPRAGE, SPACE, and VIBE MRI Techniques
  • Reply:
  • Application of 3D T1 Black-Blood Imaging in the Diagnosis of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Potential Pitfall of Slow-Flowing Blood
  • Evaluation of Thick-Slab Overlapping MIP Images of Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1-Weighted CUBE for Detection of Intracranial Metastases: A Pilot Study for Comparison of Lesion Detection, Interpretation Time, and Sensitivity with Nonoverlapping CUBE MIP, CUBE, and Inversion-Recovery-Prepared Fast-Spoiled Gradient Recalled Brain Volume
  • Application of 3D Fast Spin-Echo T1 Black-Blood Imaging in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Prediction of Patients with Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
  • Accuracy of Postcontrast 3D Turbo Spin-Echo MR Sequence for the Detection of Enhanced Inflammatory Lesions in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
  • 3D Fast Spin-Echo T1 Black-Blood Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cervical Artery Dissection
  • 3D Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence with Motion-Sensitized Driven-Equilibrium Preparation for Detection of Brain Metastases on 3T MR Imaging
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire