Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Article CommentaryInterventional

MR Angiography Follow-Up of Aneurysms Treated with Coils: Is There a Need for the Use of Gadolinium?

N. Anzalone
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2009, 30 (8) 1531; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1734
N. Anzalone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The authors of “MR Angiographic Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils: Evaluation of a Blood-Pool Contrast” report a series of 37 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils studied at 1.5T with time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA with a steady-state technique after the injection of a blood-pool contrast agent (Gadofosveset, Vasovist; Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany). They concluded that the use of Vasovist did not significantly increase the accuracy of follow-up MRA. On the other hand, CE-MRA showed a tendency toward higher accuracy for the detection of aneurysm remnants than TOF-MRA, though the difference was not statistically significant.

Their results are similar to those of other studies performed at 1.5T in which conventional gadolinium (Gd) agents were used both with TOF-MRA techniques and first-pass CE-MRA acquisitions.1–4 The use of high resolution steady-state acquisition with a blood-pool agent is similar to that of extracellular contrast media enhanced TOF-MRA, in which veins also enhance and overlap the arterial structures, in some cases giving false-positive images of aneurysm recanalization. With blood- pool agents, the risk of complete enhancement of both arteries and veins is more likely, potentially leading to more false-positive findings. In fact, a false-positive finding was reported in the present series.

The use of appropriate first-pass CE-MRA techniques allows pure enhancement of only arteries. In some cases, residual neck portions of coiled aneurysms are even better displayed than with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).5 Nevertheless, some authors2 have not found significant improvements with the use of CE-MRA compared with unenhanced TOF acquisitions. In our personal experience,4 we found better evidence of small remnants (Raymond type 1) after CE-MRA and better delineation of the recanalization in larger residual portions (Raymond type 2).

TOF techniques are prone to saturation effects at areas of slow or complex flow and to susceptibility artifacts due to coil packing. For follow-up of treated aneurysms, susceptibility artifacts and flow sensitivity are more prominent and can interfere with the evaluation. We have noted that in some cases in which an aneurysm neck is close to the parent artery, the artery is hidden by artifacts. If the parent artery is not completely evident, it is impossible to state that the aneurysm is closed. Due to the shorter TE values, CE-MRA acquisitions are less influenced by susceptibility artifacts, and consequently, parent arteries are always evident, at least in our experience. Similar results have been also demonstrated at 3T.6,7

The problem with CE techniques is that their real advantage over TOF acquisitions is in the demonstration of small type 1 remnants; however, such remnants are not considered treatable by most interventionists. We do not yet know how many of these residual aneurysms will grow to become treatable, and consequently, we do not really know how relevant or how important the advantage of CE-MRA actually is from a clinical perspective. We need more studies and greater follow-up information to understand better the relevance of these small remnants that are sometimes not even visible on DSA.

In conclusion, it seems from this study that blood-pool agents do not provide any additional information over conventional Gd agents for the demonstration of residual aneurysm remnants after coiling. Indeed, their use with steady-state sequences may actually lead to greater venous contamination. In general, the use of conventional Gd agents in CE-MRA acquisitions is still a matter for debate, particularly with regard to the kind of acquisition performed and the interpretation of results. Their use allows clearer demonstration of the remnant when present, but the clinical relevance of finding very small remnants has still to be demonstrated.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cottier JP,
    2. Bleuzen-Couthon A,
    3. Gallas S,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: is contrast material necessary in the follow-up with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1797– 803
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Delcourt C,
    3. Bouquigny F,
    4. et al
    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 744– 49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Gauvrit JY,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Caron S,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 2006; 37: 1033– 37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Anzalone N,
    2. Scomazzoni F,
    3. Cirillo M,
    4. et al
    . Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 559– 67
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Agid R,
    2. Willinsky RA,
    3. Lee SK,
    4. et al
    . Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1570– 74
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nael K,
    2. Villablanca JP,
    3. Saleh R,
    4. et al
    . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 2118– 21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Anzalone N,
    2. Scomazzoni F,
    3. Cirillo M,
    4. et al
    . Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1530– 36
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 8
1 Sep 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Angiography Follow-Up of Aneurysms Treated with Coils: Is There a Need for the Use of Gadolinium?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MR Angiography Follow-Up of Aneurysms Treated with Coils: Is There a Need for the Use of Gadolinium?
N. Anzalone
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2009, 30 (8) 1531; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1734

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
MR Angiography Follow-Up of Aneurysms Treated with Coils: Is There a Need for the Use of Gadolinium?
N. Anzalone
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2009, 30 (8) 1531; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1734
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

Interventional

  • Flow Diversion for ICA Aneurysms with Compressive Neuro-Ophthalmologic Symptoms: Predictors of Morbidity, Mortality, and Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion
  • The Safety and Efficacy of Flow Diversion versus Conventional Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-analysis of Real-world Cohort Studies from the Past 10 Years
  • Differential Subsampling with Cartesian Ordering–MRA for Classifying Residual Treated Aneurysms
Show more Interventional

Commentary

  • Commentary on the Survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Membership on the Use and Value of Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI
  • Cerebral Veins: A New “New Frontier”
  • Look beyond the Heart: Extracoronary Vascular Manifestations of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire