Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
ReplyLetter

Reply:

W.J. van Rooij and M. Sluzewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2009, 30 (9) E132; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1772
W.J. van Rooij
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Sluzewski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We appreciate Elijovich and Johnston's comment on our study regarding the coiling of very small aneurysms.1 In our study of 1295 aneurysms in 1193 patients, procedural ruptures were twice as frequent in the 196 very small aneurysms as in the remaining 1099 larger aneurysms. Also in other studies, the relation between small aneurysm size and procedural rupture is firmly established. However, Elijovich and Johnston are surprised that in the multicenter Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture After Treatment (CARAT) study of 1010 patients,2 very small aneurysm size could not be identified as a risk factor for procedural rupture.

Failure to recover an obvious and well-established risk factor should not lead to surprise but to questioning the statistics and mathematic methods that were used. Of the 1010 patients in the CARAT study, only 299 were coiled and 711 were clipped. Risk factors for procedural rupture were not separately evaluated for coiled and clipped patients, whereas those risk factors are quite different. In CARAT, peculiar and irrational parameters were studied as possible risk factors for procedural rupture, such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, smoking history, etc. We all know that a procedural rupture during coiling is caused by mechanical perforation of the aneurysm wall by the catheter, microguidewire, or coil, mostly in combination with an unfavorable vessel and aneurysm geometry. This risk is increased by small aneurysm size, recent aneurysm rupture, and probably use of supporting devices.

In turn, we are not surprised that the methods that were used in CARAT (where more than two thirds of aneurysms were clipped) did not come up with small aneurysm size as a risk factor for procedural rupture, but instead with trivial parameters such as Asian race (odds ratio 26), black race (odds ratio 11), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 14). The methodology of the CARAT study has been the subject of detailed criticism earlier, and we agree with Nguyen and Raymond that the results of CARAT can hardly be taken seriously.3

As a second point of criticism, in contrast to the findings in CARAT, Elijovich and Johnston said, “The present study also reported no increase in mortality/morbidity associated with IPR [intraprocedural rupture] in patients treated endovascularly.” This personal interpretation of our reported results is completely wrong. We found that overall morbidity and mortality in 196 very small aneurysms was not higher than that in the remaining 1099 larger aneurysms, despite twice as many procedural ruptures. Procedural rupture led to poor outcome in one third of patients, both in very small and in larger aneurysms. It is obvious that procedural rupture has a negative effect on outcome, but we did not specifically address this topic.

Drs Elijovich and Johnston's comparison of the results from our study (based on robust data and simple statistics) with the irrational conclusions from the fuzzy statistics in CARAT cannot be categorized as serious criticism.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. van Rooij WJ,
    2. Keeren GJ,
    3. Peluso JP,
    4. et al
    . Clinical and angiographic results of coiling of 196 very small (≤3 mm) intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:835–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Elijovich L,
    2. Higashida RT,
    3. Lawton MT,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) Investigators. Predictors and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture in patients treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the CARAT study. Stroke 2008;39:1501–06
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nguyen TN,
    2. Raymond J
    . The color of ruptures. Stroke 2008;39:e136, author reply e137
    FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 9
1 Oct 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply:
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reply:
W.J. van Rooij, M. Sluzewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2009, 30 (9) E132; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1772

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply:
W.J. van Rooij, M. Sluzewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2009, 30 (9) E132; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1772
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Pattern Recognition in Mitochondrial Leukodystrophies is Hampered by the Peculiarities of Mitochondrial Genetics
  • Callosal Angle Narrowing in Research Data Bases of the Cognitively Impaired
  • Reply:
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire