Interpretation Errors in CT Angiography of the Head and Neck and the Benefit of Double Reading

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hirai T,
   2. Korogi Y,
   3. Takahashi M,
   4. et al

   . CT angiography in the assessment of intracranial vessels. In: Multidetector-Row CT Angiography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2005
2. 2.↵
   1. Khan N,
   2. Ashraf N,
   3. Hameed A,
   4. et al

   . Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography and surgical outcome of cerebral aneurysms. Pak J Neurol Sci 2009;4:8–11
3. 3.↵
   1. Teksam M,
   2. McKinney A,
   3. Casey S,
   4. et al

   . Multi-section CT angiography for detection of cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1485–92

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Ogawa T,
   2. Okudera T,
   3. Noguchi K,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral aneurysms: evaluation with three-dimensional CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:447–54

   Abstract
5. 5.↵
   1. Villablanca JP,
   2. Jahan R,
   3. Hooshi P,
   4. et al

   . Detection and characterization of very small cerebral aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1187–98

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Preda L,
   2. Gaetani P,
   3. Rodriguez y Baena R,
   4. et al

   . Spiral CT angiography and surgical correlations in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. Eur Radiol 1998;8:739–45

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Yeung R,
   2. Ahmad T,
   3. Aviv RI,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of CTA to DSA in determining the etiology of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Can J Neurol Sci 2009;36:176–80

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Wada R,
   2. Aviv RI,
   3. Fox AJ,
   4. et al

   . CT angiography ‘spot sign' predicts hematoma expansion in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2007;38:1257–62. Epub 2007 February 22

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Bartlett ES,
   2. Walters TD,
   3. Symons SP,
   4. et al

   . Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. White JH,
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Symons SP

    . Diagnosis and anatomic mapping of an orbital varix by computed tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:945–47

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Funaki B,
    2. Szymski GX,
    3. Rosenblum JD

    . Significant on-call misses by radiology residents interpreting computed tomographic studies: perception versus cognition. Emerg Radiol 1997;4:290–94

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Briggs GM,
    2. Flynn PA,
    3. Worthington M,
    4. et al

    .The role of specialist neuroradiology second opinion reporting: is there added value? Clin Radiol 2008;63:791–95

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Jordan MJ,
    2. Lightfoote JB,
    3. Jordan JE

    . Quality outcomes of reinterpretation of brain CT imaging studies of subspecialty experts in neuroradiology. J Natl Commun 2006;98:1326–28
14. 14.↵
    1. Le AH,
    2. Licurse A,
    3. Catanzano TM

    . Interpretation of head CT scans in the emergency department by fellows versus general staff non-neuroradiologists: a closer look at the effectiveness of a quality control program. Emerg Radiol 2007;14:311–16

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. McCarron MO,
    2. Sands C,
    3. McCarron P

    . Quality assurance of neuroradiology in a district general hospital. QJM 2006;99(3):171–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Dinnes J,
    2. Moss S,
    3. Melia J,
    4. et al

    . Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review. Breast 2001;10:455–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Cairns J,
    2. Van der Pol M

    . Cost-effectiveness of non-consensus double reading. Breast 1998;7:243–46

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Brown J,
    2. Bryan S,
    3. Warren R

    . Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms. BMJ 1996;312:809–12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text