MR Imaging of Brain Volumes: Evaluation of a Fully Automatic Software

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ambarki K,
   2. Israelsson H,
   3. Wahlin A,
   4. et al.

   Brain ventricular size in healthy elderly: comparison between Evans index and volume measurement. Neurosurgery 67:94–99, discussion 99
2. 2.↵
   1. Yoshita M,
   2. Fletcher E,
   3. Harvey D,
   4. et al

   . Extent and distribution of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging, MCI, and AD. Neurology 2006;67:2192–98

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Zhao GJ,
   2. Li DK,
   3. Wolinsky JS,
   4. et al

   . Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging changes correlate in a clinical trial monitoring cyclosporine therapy for multiple sclerosis: the MS Study Group. J Neuroimaging 1997;7:1–7

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Desikan RS,
   2. Cabral HJ,
   3. Fischl B,
   4. et al

   . Temporoparietal MR imaging measures of atrophy in subjects with mild cognitive impairment that predict subsequent diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:532–38

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Fjell AM,
   2. Amlien IK,
   3. Westlye LT,
   4. et al

   . Mini-mental state examination is sensitive to brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2009;28:252–58

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Henneman WJ,
   2. Sluimer JD,
   3. Barnes J,
   4. et al

   . Hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer disease: added value over whole brain volume measures. Neurology 2009;72:999–1007

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Zeidman LA,
   2. Ankenbrandt WJ,
   3. Du H,
   4. et al

   . Growth rate of non-operated meningiomas. J Neurol 2008;255:891–95

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Condon B,
   2. Patterson J,
   3. Wyper D,
   4. et al

   . Use of magnetic resonance imaging to measure intracranial cerebrospinal fluid volume. Lancet 1986;1:1355–57

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Kohn MI,
   2. Tanna NK,
   3. Herman GT,
   4. et al

   . Analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes with MR imaging. Part I. Methods, reliability, and validation. Radiology 1991;178:115–22

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Anbeek P,
    2. Vincken KL,
    3. van Osch MJ,
    4. et al

    . Automatic segmentation of different-sized white matter lesions by voxel probability estimation. Med Image Anal 2004;8:205–15

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Wen W,
    2. Sachdev P

    . The topography of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI in healthy 60- to 64-year-old individuals. Neuroimage 2004;22:144–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Admiraal-Behloul F,
    2. van den Heuvel DM,
    3. Olofsen H,
    4. et al

    . Fully automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in MR images of the elderly. Neuroimage 2005;28:607–17

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Maillard P,
    2. Delcroix N,
    3. Crivello F,
    4. et al

    . An automated procedure for the assessment of white matter hyperintensities by multispectral (T1, T2, PD) MRI and an evaluation of its between-centre reproducibility based on two large community databases. Neuroradiology 2008;50:31–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Lehmann M,
    2. Douiri A,
    3. Kim LG,
    4. et al

    . Atrophy patterns in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia: a comparison of FreeSurfer and manual volumetric measurements. Neuroimage 2010;49:2264–74 Epub 2009 Oct 27

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Relkin N,
    2. Marmarou A,
    3. Klinge P,
    4. et al

    . Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57:S4–16 discussion ii-v

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Malm J,
    2. Eklund A

    . Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Pract Neurol 2006;6:14–27

    FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Ambarki K,
    2. Israelsson H,
    3. Wåhlin A,
    4. et al

    . Brain ventricular size in healthy elderly: comparison between Evans index and volume measurement. Neurosurgery 2010;67:94–99 discussion 99

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Evans W

    . An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular enlargement and cerebral atrophy. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1942;47:931–37

    CrossRefWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Jasperse B,
    2. Valsasina P,
    3. Neacsu V,
    4. et al

    . Intercenter agreement of brain atrophy measurement in multiple sclerosis patients using manually-edited SIENA and SIENAX. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:881–85

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Palm WM,
    2. Walchenbach R,
    3. Bruinsma B,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial compartment volumes in normal pressure hydrocephalus: volumetric assessment versus outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:76–79

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. van den Heuvel DM,
    2. ten Dam VH,
    3. de Craen AJ,
    4. et al

    . Measuring longitudinal white matter changes: comparison of a visual rating scale with a volumetric measurement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:875–78

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Palm WM,
    2. Saczynski JS,
    3. van der Grond J,
    4. et al

    . Ventricular dilation: association with gait and cognition. Ann Neurol 2009;66:485–93

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Huppertz HJ,
    2. Kroll-Seger J,
    3. Kloppel S,
    4. et al

    . Intra- and interscanner variability of automated voxel-based volumetry based on a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cerebral structures. Neuroimage 2010;49:2216–24 Epub 2009 Oct 28

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Barkhof F,
    2. Scheltens P

    . Imaging of white matter lesions. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;13(suppl 2):21–30

    PubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Piguet O,
    2. Ridley LJ,
    3. Grayson DA,
    4. et al

    . Comparing white matter lesions on T2 and FLAIR MRI in the Sydney Older Persons Study. Eur J Neurol 2005;12:399–402

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. van Straaten EC,
    2. Fazekas F,
    3. Rostrup E,
    4. et al

    . Impact of white matter hyperintensities scoring method on correlations with clinical data: the LADIS study. Stroke 2006;37:836–40 Epub 2006 Jan 26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Klauschen F,
    2. Goldman A,
    3. Barra V,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of automated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:1310–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Cocosco C,
    2. Kollokian V,
    3. Kwan R-S,
    4. et al.

    BrainWeb: online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain. Copenhagen, Denmark. May 19–23, 1997