Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
ReplyLetter

Reply:

O. Naggara, J.-F. Meder and C. Oppenheim
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E92; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2512
O. Naggara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-F. Meder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Oppenheim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We thank N. Anzalone and M. Cadioli for acknowledging the importance of our study on the added value of high-resolution (HR) MR imaging for the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection (VAD).1 An early and reliable identification of VAD is important in preventing ischemic brain lesions. The diagnosis of cervical artery dissection is currently based on 1) a suggestive clinical presentation, 2) exclusion of atherosclerosis, and 3) supportive radiologic evidence. Obtaining radiologic evidence of VAD may be a real challenge, given the highly tortuous course of vertebral arteries, the great variability in normal-vessel caliber, the presence of the thick bony covering, and adjacent veins. The emergence of HR rapid imaging methods has enabled MR imaging to noninvasively image the fine internal structure of cervical artery walls. There is now solid evidence that HR MR imaging can identify the major components of atherosclerotic plaque (ie, lipid core, mural hemorrhage, calcifications, and the fibrous cap).2 This enables differentiating stable and unstable atherosclerotic plaques.3

Beyond atherosclerosis, HR MR imaging can be used further in case of suspicion of cervical artery dissection, providing an excellent visualization of the cervical artery mural hematoma on both carotid and vertebral arteries.4–6 We demonstrated the usefulness of HR MR imaging in patients who are suspected of having VAD, for whom conventional imaging work-up is inconclusive. However, one can question how far we should go with HR. Because of the limited accessibility of HR MR imaging and the long scanning time inherent to the technique, the idea is not to perform HR MR imaging in all patients with VAD but rather to improve our imaging protocols to get supportive imaging evidence in most patients. This is already feasible by using 3T MR magnets with standard multichannel head and neck coils. The bonus signal intensity–to-noise ratio of 3T can be targeted at improving spatial resolution without the need of an additional dedicated surface coil. In daily practice, 3T fat-suppressed T1- and T2-weighted sequences with 3-mm section thickness challenge the HR obtained by using a dedicated surface coil with a 1.5T MR imaging unit (ie, 500 × 500 μm × 3 mm) to image the walls of the cervical arteries. HR MR imaging at 1.5T prefigures tomorrow's 3T imaging.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Naggara O,
    2. Louillet F,
    3. Touzé E,
    4. et al
    . Added value of high-resolution MR imaging in the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1707–12
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Mitsumori LM,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al
    . In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation 2001; 104: 2051–56
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Takaya N,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Chu B,
    4. et al
    . Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke 2006; 37: 818–23
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Naggara O,
    2. Oppenheim C,
    3. Toussaint JF,
    4. et al
    . Asymptomatic spontaneous acute vertebral artery dissection: diagnosis by high-resolution magnetic resonance images with a dedicated surface coil. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2434–35
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bachmann R,
    2. Nassenstein I,
    3. Kooijman H,
    4. et al
    . High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla in the short-term follow-up of patients with proven cervical artery dissection. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 460–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Naggara O,
    2. Touzé E,
    3. Marsico R,
    4. et al
    . High-resolution MR imaging of periarterial edema associated with biological inflammation in spontaneous carotid dissection. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 2255–60
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 5
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply:
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reply:
O. Naggara, J.-F. Meder, C. Oppenheim
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E92; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2512

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply:
O. Naggara, J.-F. Meder, C. Oppenheim
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E92; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2512
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Vertebral Artery Dissection: Looking for the Ideal Study Protocol
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fair Performance of CT in Diagnosing Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Reply:
  • Regarding “Altered Blood Flow in the Ophthalmic and Internal Carotid Arteries in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Measured Using Noncontrast MR Angiography at 7T”
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire