Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
ReplyLetter

Reply:

R.I. Aviv, M. Sharma and T.-Y. Lee
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E94; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2510
R.I. Aviv
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Sharma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.-Y. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We thank Dr Kloska for his insightful remarks on our study, which showed that current CT angiographic source imaging (CTA-SI) may be flow- not volume-weighted.1 We wish to clarify a number of points, specifically as they relate to the technical differences between the study he cites2 and ours. First, we would like to clarify his observations; our contrast injection is routinely followed by 40 mL of normal saline injected at the same rate as the initial contrast bolus. The divergence of our results from those reported in his recent study is most likely attributable to the difference in the order in which CTA and CT perfusion (CTP) were performed in each study.2 In our protocol, CTA was performed while the patient was contrast-naïve. This, coupled with the fact that contrast does not have enough time to reach all the blood vessels in the ischemic/infarct region, suggests that the CTA-SI reflects the arrival time difference between the normal and ischemic regions.

In general, it is always true that a region with a long arrival time would have low blood flow. This explains why the CTA defect in our article is correlated to the blood flow defect. On the other hand in the study cited by Dr Kloska,2 CTA was performed after injection of contrast for a CTP acquisition. By the time CTA is complete, the contrast injected for the CTP study would have time to reach all the blood vessels within the ischemic region, accounting for a smaller CTA-SI defect than when the brain is contrast-naïve.

Dr Kloska suggests that a time delay based on maximum enhancement in the sagittal sinus may account for differences in the 2 studies. We do not find this explanation convincing because the time to maximum sagittal sinus enhancement in a patient with stroke may not be that different from that in a healthy subject because the sagittal sinus drains blood from the whole brain including the normal hemisphere. Indeed, it is the cortical veins, not the superior sagittal sinus, where contrast delay is observed in balloon test occlusions.3 We do not think that the slightly longer delay used in their study would allow enough time for contrast to reach all blood vessels in the ischemic/infarct area; this belief strengthens our initial assertion that differences are related to CTA/CTP order and not to the appropriateness of the contrast injection protocol.

CTA-SI images can be either blood flow– or blood volume–weighted. For a region in the brain where maximum contrast arrival time (Tmax) is shorter than the delay time of the acquisition of the CTA study, the region in the CTA-SI will be blood volume–weighted. Conversely, if Tmax is longer than the delay time of the CTA acquisition, the region in the CTA-SI will be blood flow–weighted. “Tmax” is defined as the time-to-peak of the deconvolved impulse residue function (IRF) as in the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution study.4 A significant portion of appearance time (T0) is the contrast arrival/T0 at the brain region relative to that of the input arterial function used to calculate the IRF in the deconvolution. We randomly selected 2 acute stroke studies from our data base and found that T0 and Tmax can be as long as 14 seconds and 22 seconds, respectively.

In summary, the possible dual nature of CTA-SI defects, either ischemia or infarct, means that it has to be interpreted together with Tmax or T0 maps and correlated with the scanning time after injection of contrast. This consideration points to the potential pitfall of the use of CTA-SI by itself in acute stroke diagnosis.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Sharma M,
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Symons S,
    4. et al
    . CT angiographic source images: flow- or volume-weighted? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 359–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Wittkamp G,
    2. Buerke B,
    3. Dziewas R,
    4. et al
    . Whole brain perfused blood volume CT: visualization of infarcted tissue compared to quantitative perfusion CT. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 427–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Abud DG,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Piotin M,
    4. et al
    . Venous phase timing during balloon test occlusion as a criterion for permanent internal carotid artery sacrifice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2602–09
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Albers GW,
    2. Thijs VN,
    3. Wechsler L,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 2006; 60: 508–17
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 5
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply:
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reply:
R.I. Aviv, M. Sharma, T.-Y. Lee
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E94; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2510

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply:
R.I. Aviv, M. Sharma, T.-Y. Lee
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E94; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2510
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • CT Angiographic Source Images with Modern Multisection CT Scanners: Appropriate Injection Protocol Is Crucial
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • CT Angiography Source Images with Modern Multisection CT Scanners: Delay Time from Contrast Injection to Imaging Determines Correlation with Infarct Core
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Dilator-Dotter Technique for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Further Applications in the Vertebral Arteries
  • Pattern Recognition in Mitochondrial Leukodystrophies is Hampered by the Peculiarities of Mitochondrial Genetics
  • Callosal Angle Narrowing in Research Data Bases of the Cognitively Impaired
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire