Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLetter

Variability in Visual Assessment of Cerebral Aneurysms Could Be Reduced by Quantification of Recurrence Volumes

M. Groth, J. Fiehler and N.D. Forkert
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2011, 32 (8) E163-E164; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2685
M. Groth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Fiehler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.D. Forkert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

After endovascular coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm, coil compaction, aneurysm growth, or migration of the coil into intraluminal thrombus might lead to recurrence. In this case, interventional neuroradiologists have to decide whether to treat the recurrent aneurysm. Although there are several factors influencing the individual treatment decision, such as aneurysm shape, initial aneurysm size, dynamic aneurysm growth, patient preference, individual treatment risk, patient age, and so forth, previous observations suggest that mainly the recurrence volume determines the treatment decision.1

We have read the article of Daugherty et al entitled “Observer Agreement Regarding the Necessity of Retreatment of Previously Coiled Recurrent Cerebral Aneurysms”2 with special interest. The authors evaluated observer agreement with respect to the question of whether to treat recurrent aneurysms. The experienced interventionalists (some were even from the same “school”) revealed substantial variability in their opinions about the indication for treatment of recurrent aneurysms.

First, this observation reflects the notorious difficulties of clinical therapy decision-making in these conditions. A certain morphology or size suggesting definite need for retreatment is unclear because hemorrhage from residual or recurrent aneurysms is a rare event. Second, the authors put the use of retreatment as an objective end point in clinical trails into question on the basis of the considerable disagreement. Therefore, it would be desirable to define reliable parameters that help to decide whether retreatment is indicated and to consequently assess objective end points in clinical trails (eg, for the evaluation of new coils). We believe that the general use of 2D digital subtraction angiography images for the evaluation of the genuine 3D structure “recurrent aneurysm appearance” is one major source of heterogeneity. The personal calibration of visual preconception by a specific “school” could be another explanation.

In our opinion, evaluation by visual inspection as used in core labs could be replaced by quantitative volumetric parameters. Recently, such a method for the extraction of a quantitative parameter characterizing recurrent aneurysms was proposed and validated.3 Briefly, the aneurysm-recurrence volume is estimated by rigid coregistration of two 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) datasets acquired at 2 discrete time points after therapy. For this estimation, the vascular structures are automatically segmented4 in both datasets and used for a masked intensity-based registration. After registration, the aligned vessel segmentations are subtracted such that the aneurysm-recurrence volume is left over, which can be used for quantification purposes (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Recurrence of a carotid terminus aneurysm after endovascular coil treatment. Baseline TOF-MRA after endovascular coiling (A) and at 1-year follow-up (B) show recurrence. Conventional cerebral angiogram (C) and computer-aided 3D aneurysm-recurrence volume quantification based on TOF-MRA image sequences (D). The difference between the baseline and follow-up dataset indicates a coil condensation and consecutive reperfusion of the aneurysm (red).

TOF-MRA is a standard follow-up method after endovascular aneurysm therapy in many centers worldwide. The key difficulties in the application of 3D MRA image sequences for aneurysm-recurrence volume quantification have been the statistical basis of possible outcome variables as well as the development of an algorithm that allows the precise coregistration of routine MRA scans in 3D space. Such a method needs to be both robust and precise, even if the image data are from different MR imaging scanners.

When applied correctly, such volume measurements can be used as reproducible end points in clinical trails. However, to this point, these measurements are not suitable for clinical decision-making.

A volumetric surrogate end point could substantially decrease sample size by limiting the variability in the assessment as described by Daugherty et al.2 Such analysis might allow a more timely estimation of possible benefits of new materials at a fraction of the cost of a study with hundreds of patients that is normally required, at least in part, to reduce the variability introduced by visual assessment.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ries T,
    2. Wulff A,
    3. Wegscheider K,
    4. et al
    . Unexpected kink in aneurysm recurrence volume distribution is associated with retreatment decision. Neuroradiology 2010;52:657–58. Epub 2010 Apr 22
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Daugherty WP,
    2. Rad AE,
    3. White JB,
    4. et al
    . Observer agreement regarding the necessity of retreatment of previously coiled recurrent cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:566–69
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ries T,
    2. Wegscheider K,
    3. Wulff A,
    4. et al
    . Quantification of recurrence volumes after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysm as surrogate endpoint for treatment stability. Neuroradiology 2011;53:593–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Forkert ND,
    2. Schmidt-Richberg A,
    3. Fiehler J,
    4. et al
    . Fuzzy-based vascular structure enhancement in time-of-flight MRA images for improved segmentation. Methods Inf Med 2011;50:74–83
    PubMed
  • © 2011 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 8
1 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variability in Visual Assessment of Cerebral Aneurysms Could Be Reduced by Quantification of Recurrence Volumes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Variability in Visual Assessment of Cerebral Aneurysms Could Be Reduced by Quantification of Recurrence Volumes
M. Groth, J. Fiehler, N.D. Forkert
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2011, 32 (8) E163-E164; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2685

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Variability in Visual Assessment of Cerebral Aneurysms Could Be Reduced by Quantification of Recurrence Volumes
M. Groth, J. Fiehler, N.D. Forkert
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2011, 32 (8) E163-E164; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2685
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Reply:
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply:
  • The Complementary Role of CT Perfusion and Transcranial Doppler in the Assessment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia after Aneurysmal SAH
  • Dilator-Dotter Technique for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Further Applications in the Vertebral Arteries
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire