Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Why Clinicians Should Not Resort to Epidemiologic Studies to Justify Interventions

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Brinjikji W,
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Nasr DM,
   4. et al

   . Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001–2008. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1071–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Brinjikji W,
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. et al

   . Patient outcomes are better for unruptured cerebral aneurysms treated at centers that preferentially treat with endovascular coiling: a study of the National Inpatient Sample 2001–2007. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1065–70.

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Brinjikji W,
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. et al

   . Effect of age on outcomes of treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a study of the National Inpatient Sample 2001–2008. Stroke 2011;42:1320–24

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ

   . The treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: cause for concern? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1076–77

   FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Byar DP

   . Why data bases should not replace randomized clinical trials. Biometrics 1980;36:337–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Darsaut TE,
   2. Findlay JM,
   3. Raymond J

   . for the CURES Collaborative Group. The design of the Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular versus Surgery (CURES) trial. Can J Neurol Sci 2011;38:236–41

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Darsaut TE,
   3. Molyneux AJ

   . for the TEAM Collaborative Group. A trial on unruptured intracranial aneurysms (the TEAM trial): results, lessons from a failure and the necessity for clinical care trials. Trials 2011;12:64

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Sox HC,
   2. Greenfield S

   . Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:203–05

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science