Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLETTER

CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Is It Overkill?

P.P. Ng, M.J. Wilder and P.A. Jenkins
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2012, 33 (11) E138; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3393
P.P. Ng
aDepartment of Radiology University of Utah Health Sciences Center Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.J. Wilder
aDepartment of Radiology University of Utah Health Sciences Center Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.A. Jenkins
aDepartment of Radiology University of Utah Health Sciences Center Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We read with great interest the article by Kranz et al in the August 2012 issue of AJNR entitled, “CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Safety, Technique, and Radiation Dose Parameters.”1 The authors concluded that CT fluoroscopy (CTF)– guided epidural steroid injections (ESIs) can be performed with a low rate of procedural complications and short procedural and CTF times, making these a practical alternative to using conventional fluoroscopy (CF).

While we agree that CTF provides superior visualization of anatomic structures in relation to the needle tip compared with CF, we do not believe that such precise visualization is necessary or increases the safety of the procedure. Our group of 3 neurointerventionalists has performed hundreds of interlaminar cervical ESIs by using CF for years without a single clinical complication.

We use single-plane CF (Inova 4100IQ; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin), starting with a near-anteroposterior tube position until the needle is advanced to touch the spinal lamina, at which time the tube is rotated steeply in the contralateral oblique position to permit live CF visualization of needle advancement to the spinolaminar line. A loss-of-resistance technique is then used to advance the needle tip into the epidural space, which is confirmed with injection of 1 mL of contrast. Inadvertent subarachnoid injection is rare but is easily identified by rapid dissipation of contrast from the needle tip and pooling in the dependent subarachnoid space.

A review of our last 16 cases revealed a mean CF time of 0.9 minutes, procedural time of 10 minutes, and mean entrance skin air kerma (ESAK) of 16.7 mGy. If one assumes a mean shaded surface display of 64 cm, skin exposed area of 49 cm2, beam quality of 4.3 mmAl, mean kilovolt (peak) of 70, and effective dose per milligray of ESAK to be 0.015–0.03 mSv/mGy (depending on tube angulation), the effective dose was 0.3 mSv, and the skin dose, 23 mGy. By comparison, by using the authors' parameters of mean CTF time = 24 seconds with a median tube current of 70 mA and assuming a 1-cm CTF scan range, the effective dose would be approximately 2.1 mSv, depending on scan position. Moreover, if one assumes a mean neck circumference of 38 cm, the approximate skin dose of a CTF procedure, excluding planning scans, is close to 0.5 Gy. These doses are already 7 and 20 times the CF effective and skin doses to the patient respectively, without accounting for CT planning scans. Higher doses to the operator with CTF can also be expected and should be monitored.2

The authors stated that many operators using CF inject at the C7-T1 interspace or below where the spinal canal is wider, to increase safety, and that this location limits the amount of medication reaching stenotic levels more cranially. We disagree that this is a significant limitation due to the small volume and relatively short length of the cervical epidural space. We typically observe contrast migration for several spinal levels with just 1 mL of contrast injection. A nuclear medicine study revealed impressive cranially directed spread of technetium Tc99m-labeled red blood cells from the site of the epidural injection.3 Regardless, we also perform CF-guided cervical ESIs from C2–3 to C7-T1, unless MR imaging shows such severe spinal stenosis that the spinal cord directly abuts the ligamentum flavum; then, we target an adjacent level.

The authors describe waiting for 3–4 seconds after contrast injection before rescanning with CTF to detect washout in the event of vascular injection. We have observed cases of mixed injection into the epidural space and an epidural vein that would be missed by using this approach.

While we appreciate the authors' work and the proposition to use CTF as an alternative to CF for cervical interlaminar ESIs, we believe that they overestimate the safety of CTF, particularly with regard to radiation exposure. CF provides adequate visualization of pertinent anatomy and allows superior confirmation of needle-tip position during contrast injection. CF procedures can be completed in less time, with less expense and a lower radiation dose without compromising procedural safety.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kranz PG,
    2. Raduazo P,
    3. Gray L,
    4. et al
    . CT fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar steroid injections: safety, technique, and radiation dose parameters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 1221– 24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Keat N
    . Real-time CT and CT fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 2001; 74: 1088– 90
    FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Szeinfeld M,
    2. Ihmeidan IH,
    3. Moser MM,
    4. et al
    . Epidural blood patch: evaluation of the volume and spread of blood injected into the epidural space. Anesthesiology 1986; 64: 820– 22
    PubMed
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 11
1 Dec 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Is It Overkill?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Is It Overkill?
P.P. Ng, M.J. Wilder, P.A. Jenkins
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2012, 33 (11) E138; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3393

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Is It Overkill?
P.P. Ng, M.J. Wilder, P.A. Jenkins
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2012, 33 (11) E138; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3393
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Reply:
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply:
  • The Complementary Role of CT Perfusion and Transcranial Doppler in the Assessment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia after Aneurysmal SAH
  • Dilator-Dotter Technique for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Further Applications in the Vertebral Arteries
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire