Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
ReplyLETTER

Reply:

P.G. Kranz, P. Raduazo, L. Gray, R.K. Kilani and J.K. Hoang
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2012, 33 (11) E139; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3430
P.G. Kranz
aDepartment of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Raduazo
aDepartment of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Gray
aDepartment of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.K. Kilani
aDepartment of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.K. Hoang
aDepartment of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We very much appreciate the comments of Drs. Ng et al in response to our article “CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Safety, Technique, and Radiation Dose Parameters.”

Dr. Ng and colleagues question the necessity of CT guidance given the large number of successful injections they have performed under conventional fluoroscopic (CF) guidance, and suggest that injection above the C7-T1 level can be safe under CF guidance. We do not doubt that such procedures can be performed safely in experienced hands. Many authors would disagree with this opinion, however.1⇓⇓–4 Such authors cite a number of anatomic and technical reasons for their objections, as summarized in our manuscript, which may be overcome by using CT fluoroscopy (CTF). Nevertheless, the purpose of our article is not to advocate for 1 type of image guidance over another, because comparative safety and effectiveness data have not been established. Any position taken on this issue would be based on opinion (ie, level 5 evidence), at best. Nor is it our intent to supplant CF guidance for those interventionalists who successfully use it to perform injections, but rather to provide an alternative method for those with reservations about the safety of the procedure.

We fully agree with Dr. Ng and colleagues that radiation dose must be closely scrutinized with any procedure. We take issue with the dose estimates they propose, however. Dose comparison between CF and CTF is not straightforward, due to narrow beam collimation and scan lengths of <1 cm used with CTF. In CT, conversion factors have been used to convert dose-length product to effective dose (ED), but these are not reliable when scan lengths of less than 2 cm are used, and can result in the incorrect estimation of ED by up to a factor of 30.5 For this reason, estimates based on phantom studies may be more reliable. A direct comparison of lumbar CF and CTF guided injections at our institution using an anthropomorphic phantom demonstrated that the ED from the CTF portion of a lumbar injection was half that of the ED for the same procedure performed with CF.6 Ultimately, the small differential risk of radiation-related cancer induction between procedures must be balanced against any potential safety benefit related to the procedure, which as yet remains undetermined. Such overall safety comparisons are therefore premature.

Next, the authors argue that injection at C7-T1 is equivalent to injections at higher cervical levels, though the authors admit that despite this argument they do perform injections as high as C2–3 when anatomy permits. One may speculate as to the validity of this assertion, which is based on indirect evidence, and whether the delivered concentration of injected steroid medication is really equivalent when it reaches a level by remote epidural spread as opposed to direct injection. In the end, though, we are not aware of any study that directly addresses the fundamental question of clinical outcomes using these 2 different approaches.

As for the potential for mixed injection into an epidural vein and the epidural space, we have observed no adverse events to date involving such an injection in several hundred cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections and several thousand lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections.

Drs. Ng et al nicely highlight several topics related to cervical steroid injections where there is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions. We believe that these questions will be best addressed with further investigation rather than opinion. The fact that these issues are unresolved, however, does not detract from the primary purpose of our manuscript, which was to report our initial experience with a technique that may have potential advantages—and potential drawbacks—compared with CF, as a basis for future experience.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Watanabe AT,
    2. Nishimura E,
    3. Garris J
    . Image-guided epidural steroid injections. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 5: 186– 93
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Derby R,
    2. Lee SH,
    3. Kim BJ,
    4. et al
    . Complications following cervical epidural steroid injections by expert interventionalists in 2003. Pain Physician 2004; 7: 445– 49
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Abbasi A,
    2. Malhotra G,
    3. Malanga G,
    4. et al
    . Complications of interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injections: a review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2144– 51
    CrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. DePalma MJ
    1. Reiter TM,
    2. Baker RM,
    3. DePalma MJ,
    4. et al
    . Epidural steroid instillation for cervical radiculopathy. In: DePalma MJ , ed. iSpine: Evidence-Based Interventional Spine Care. New York: Demos Medical Publishing 2011: 405–18
  5. 5.↵
    1. Huda W,
    2. Ogden KM,
    3. Khorasani MR
    . Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology 2008; 248: 995– 1003
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hoang JK,
    2. Yoshizumi TT,
    3. Toncheva G,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dose exposure for lumbar spine epidural steroid injections: a comparison of conventional fluoroscopy data and CT fluoroscopy techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 4: 778– 82
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 11
1 Dec 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply:
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reply:
P.G. Kranz, P. Raduazo, L. Gray, R.K. Kilani, J.K. Hoang
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2012, 33 (11) E139; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3430

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply:
P.G. Kranz, P. Raduazo, L. Gray, R.K. Kilani, J.K. Hoang
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2012, 33 (11) E139; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3430
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Is It Overkill?
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Dilator-Dotter Technique for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Further Applications in the Vertebral Arteries
  • Pattern Recognition in Mitochondrial Leukodystrophies is Hampered by the Peculiarities of Mitochondrial Genetics
  • Callosal Angle Narrowing in Research Data Bases of the Cognitively Impaired
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire