Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Factors Affecting Midterm Quality Anatomic Results: Analysis in a Prospective, Multicenter Series of Patients (CLARITY)

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group: International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms—a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1262–63

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Ferns SP,
   2. Sprengers MES,
   3. von Rooij WJ,
   4. et al

   . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009; 40: e523–29. Epub 2009 Jun 11

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Cognard C,
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Anxionnat R,
   4. et al.,
   5. for the Clarity Study Group

   . Results of embolization used as the first treatment choice in a consecutive nonselected population of ruptured aneurysms: clinical results of the Clarity GDC study. Neurosurgery 2011; 69: 837–41, discussion 842

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Cognard C,
   3. Ricolfi F,
   4. et al.,
   5. for the CLARITY investigators

   . Immediate anatomic results after endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: analysis of the CLARITY series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 907–11. Epub 2010 Jan 14

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Cognard C,
   3. Anxionnat R,
   4. et al.,
   5. for the CLARITY Investigators

   . Remodeling technique for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms had a higher rate of adequate occlusion than did conventional coil embolization with comparable safety. Radiology 2011; 258: 546–53. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Cognard C,
   3. Anxionnat R,
   4. et al.,
   5. for the CLARITY investigators

   . Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting the rate and outcome of endovascular treatment complications in a series of 782 patients (CLARITY). Radiology 2010; 256: 916–23

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Cognard C,
   3. Ricolfi F,
   4. et al.,
   5. on behalf of CLARITY investigators

   . Mid-term anatomic results after endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with Gugliemi detachable coils and Matrix coils: analysis of the CLARITY series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 469–73

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Piotin M,
   2. Blanc R,
   3. Spelle L,
   4. et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysm: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010; 41: 110–15

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Pierot L

   . Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: where are we? J Neuroradiol 2011; 38: 40–46. Epub 2011 Jan 22

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Dowd CF,
    3. Higashida RT,
    4. et al.,
    5. for the CARAT investigators

    . Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008; 39: 120–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Hope JK,
    2. Byrne JV,
    3. Molyneux AJ

    . Factors influencing successful angiographic occlusion of aneurysms treated by coil occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 391–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003; 34: 1398–403

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Cognard C,
    2. Weill A,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. et al

    . Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999; 212: 348–56

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Ortiz R,
    2. Stefanski M,
    3. Rosenwasser R,
    4. et al

    . Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for recurrence of aneurysms treated by endosaccular occlusion. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 672–75

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Choi DS,
    2. Kim MC,
    3. Lee SK,
    4. et al

    . Clinical and angiographic long-term follow-up of completely coiled aneurysms using endovascular technique. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 575–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Songsaeng D,
    2. Geibprasert S,
    3. ter Brugge KG,
    4. et al

    . Impact of individual intracranial aneurysm morphology on initial obliteration and recurrence rates of endovascular treatments: a multivariate analysis. J Neurosurg 2011; 114: 994–1002

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Gallas S,
    2. Pasco A,
    3. Cottier JP,
    4. et al

    . A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1723–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Willinsky RA,
    2. Peltz J,
    3. da Costa L,
    4. et al

    . Clinical and angiographic follow-up of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1035–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Boulin A,
    2. Pierot L

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D TOF MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001; 219: 108–13

    PubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Delcourt C,
    3. Bouquigny F,
    4. et al

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 744–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text