Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Fig 1.
Outlines of the search and selection process.
- Fig 2.
The relation (with 95% confidence limits) between the mean procedural time to recanalization and independent functional outcome (mRS ≤2) in the different studies. P value for the Cuzick test of trend is .06. The square indicates the MD; the triangle, the PS; and the circle, the RS.
Tables
Author Year Centers Design Device Used Size (Patients) Mean Age (yr) Median NIHSS Score Aleu et al21 2011 Single Retrospective Ret stent 54 68 19 Castaño et al24 2010 Single Retrospective Ret stent 20 65.6 19 Devlin et al37 2007 Single Retrospective Merci 25 63 18 Frei et al18 2011 Multi Prospective Penumbra 53 63 18 Grunwald et al38 2009 Single Retrospective Penumbra 29 58.4 20 Kang et al25 2011 Multi Retrospective Penumbra 22 59 18.1 Kulcsár et al26 2010 Single Prospective Penumbra 27 66 14 Lee et al39 2009 Single Retrospective Merci 17 67 18 Menon et al23 2011 Single Prospective Penumbra 27 61.5 18 Menon et al40 2012 Single Prospective Ret stent 14 62.1 14 Pereira et al22 2011 Single Prospective Ret stent 25 66.3 18.7 Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators13 2009 Multi Retrospective Penumbra 125 63.5 20 Smith et al12 2005 Multi Retrospective Merci 151 67 20 Smith et al16 2008 Multi Retrospective Merci 164 68 19 Struffert et al41 2009 Single Prospective Penumbra 15 60.3 14 Tarr et al42 2010 Multi Prospective Penumbra 157 65 18.1 Note:—Multi indicates multiple; Ret stent, retrievable stent.
Author Device Used Mean/Median Puncture to Recanalization Time (min) TIMI 2–3 Recanalization (No.) (%) Aleu et al21 RS 51 50 of 54 (92.6) Castaño et al24 RS 70 18 of 20 (90)a Devlin et al37 MD 108b 14 of 25 (56) Frei et al18 PS 52 47 of 53 (88.7) Grunwald et al38 PS 51 25 of 29 (86.2) Kang et al25 PS 40 22 of 22 (100)a Kulcsár et al26 PS 97 25 of 27 (92.6)a Lee et al39 MD 129.6b 13 of 17 (76.5) Menon et al23 PS 80 23 of 27 (85.2) Menon et al40 RS 84 12 of 14 (85.7) Pereira et al22 RS 42c 25 of 25 (100) Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators13 PS 97 103 of 125 (82.4) Smith et al12 MD 126b 72 of 151 (47.7) Smith et al16 MD 96b 112 of 164 (68.3) Struffert et al41 PS 60c 12 of 15 (80) Tarr et al42 PS 41 137 of 157 (87.3)
In this issue
A Meta-Analysis of Observational Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy Studies Using the Merci Device, Penumbra System, and Retrievable Stents
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Need for rescue treatment and its implication: stent retriever versus contact aspiration thrombectomy
- Neuroendovascular management of emergent large vessel occlusion: update on the technical aspects and standards of practice by the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery
- Effect of Retrievable Stent Size on Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multicenter Study
- Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Embolectomy for stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery
- Overcoming the evening/weekend effects on time delays and outcomes of endovascular stroke therapy: the Calgary Stroke Program experience
- Evaluation of Interval Times From Onset to Reperfusion in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial
- Impact of Age and Baseline NIHSS Scores on Clinical Outcomes in the Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Solitaire FR in Acute Ischemic Stroke Study
- Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement in Scoring Angiographic Results of Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy
- Acute Ischemic Stroke: Time, Penumbra, and Reperfusion