Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLETTER

Paternalism in Radiology?

R.T. Fitzgerald
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2013, 34 (1) E8; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3438
R.T. Fitzgerald
aNeuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

I read with great interest the article “Vertebral Endplate Changes Are Not Associated with Chronic Low Back Pain among Southern European Subjects: A Case Control Study” by Kovacs et al.1 Their article demonstrates the challenges we face when attempting to correlate imaging findings with clinical symptoms in patients with back pain.

In their discussion, the authors state, “In the case of vertebral endplate changes, refraining from including this finding in radiologic reports or mentioning it as a finding that is associated with disk degeneration but is likely to be clinically irrelevant may be a way of protecting patients from unnecessarily aggressive forms of treatment or overtreatment.” Are the data strong enough to support the authors' view? This opinion, potentially stemming from the personal experience of the authors and well-publicized articles examining the overuse of spinal fusion surgery,2 merits further examination and raises a general question on the role of paternalism in radiology.

What motivations lie behind the propensity to include or exclude certain findings in our reports? I suspect that all neuroradiologists, at one time or another, have downplayed what we perceived as inconsequential findings by our choice of wording or omission from the radiologic report. In fact, in most groups, some partners may be thought of as “overcallers” or “undercallers” based on their long-term pattern of reporting. We all want what is best for our patients and thus are undoubtedly influenced when we encounter the negative sequelae of surgical procedures performed for questionable indications. Are choices of what to include or omit from our reports always backed by scientific evidence? Although Kovacs et al1 provide robust data on the question of endplate changes and back pain, are these results conclusive enough to eliminate discussion of endplate changes in all of our patients referred for spine MR imaging in the setting of back pain? To what degree does the paucity or absence of relevant clinical information on examination requisitions confound how we apply significance to imaging findings? Does it constitute radiologic paternalism to under-report certain imaging findings on the basis of our own perception of clinical relevance? By our choice of whether to report a finding, are we truly “protecting patients from unnecessarily aggressive forms of treatment or overtreatment” as Kovacs et al suggest?

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kovacs FM,
    2. Arana E,
    3. Royuela A,
    4. et al
    . Endplate changes are not associated with chronic low back pain among Southern European subjects: a case control study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1519–24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Deyo RA,
    2. Nachemson A,
    3. Mirza SK
    . Spinal-fusion surgery; the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 2004;350:722–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  • © 2013 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 1
1 Jan 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Paternalism in Radiology?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Paternalism in Radiology?
R.T. Fitzgerald
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2013, 34 (1) E8; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3438

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Paternalism in Radiology?
R.T. Fitzgerald
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2013, 34 (1) E8; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3438
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Reply:
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • COVID-19 Related Central Nervous System Vasculopathy: Beyond Vasculitis
  • Reply:
  • Diagnostic Value of “Mushroom” Morphology in Vertebral Chordoma
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire