Prospective Comparison of Angio-Seal versus Manual Compression for Hemostasis after Neurointerventional Procedures under Systemic Heparinization

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bogart DB,
   2. Bogart MA,
   3. Miller JT,
   4. et al

   . Femoral artery catheterization complications: a study of 503 consecutive patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995;34:8–13

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Heintzen MP,
   2. Strauer BE

   . Peripheral arterial complications after heart catheterization [in German]. Herz 1998;23:4–20

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Pracyk JB,
   2. Wall TC,
   3. Longabaugh JP,
   4. et al

   . A randomized trial of vascular hemostasis techniques to reduce femoral vascular complications after coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:970–76

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Geyik S,
   2. Yavuz K,
   3. Akgoz A,
   4. et al

   . The safety and efficacy of the Angio-Seal closure device in diagnostic and interventional neuroangiography setting: a single-center experience with 1,443 closures. Neuroradiology 2007;49:739–46

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Khaghany K,
   2. Al-Ali F,
   3. Spigelmoyer T,
   4. et al

   . Efficacy and safety of the Perclose Closer S device after neurointerventional procedures: prospective study and literature review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1420–24

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. McTaggart RA,
   2. Raghavan D,
   3. Haas RA,
   4. et al

   . StarClose vascular closure device: safety and efficacy of deployment and reaccess in a neurointerventional radiology service. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1148–50

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Morris PP,
   2. Braden G

   . Neurointerventional experience with an arteriotomy suture device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1706–09

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Park Y,
   2. Roh HG,
   3. Choo SW,
   4. et al

   . Prospective comparison of collagen plug (Angio-Seal) and suture-mediated (the Closer S) closure devices at femoral access sites. Korean J Radiol 2005;6:248–55

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Herbreteau D,
   3. Bracard S,
   4. et al

   . An evaluation of immediate sheath removal and use of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device in neuroradiological interventions. Neuroradiology 2006;48:45–49

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Koenigsberg RA,
    2. Wysoki M,
    3. Weiss J,
    4. et al

    . Risk of clot formation in femoral arterial sheaths maintained overnight for neuroangiographic procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:297–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Cremonesi A,
    2. Castriota F,
    3. Tarantino F,
    4. et al

    . Femoral arterial hemostasis using the Angio-Seal^a system after coronary and vascular percutaneous angioplasty and stenting. J Invasive Cardiol 1998;10:464–69

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Kapadia SR,
    2. Raymond R,
    3. Knopf W,
    4. et al

    . The 6Fr Angio-Seal arterial closure device: results from a multimember prospective registry. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:789–91, A8

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kussmaul WG 3rd.,
    2. Buchbinder M,
    3. Whitlow PL,
    4. et al

    . Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1685–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Sanborn TA,
    2. Gibbs HH,
    3. Brinker JA,
    4. et al

    . A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 1999;11(suppl B):6B–13B

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Schrader R,
    2. Steinbacher S,
    3. Burger W,
    4. et al

    . Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: a randomized trial. J Invasive Cardiol 1999;11(suppl B):14B–18B

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Silber S,
    2. Bjorvik A,
    3. Muhling H,
    4. et al

    . Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;43:421–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Tavris DR,
    2. Gallauresi BA,
    3. Dey S,
    4. et al

    . Risk of local adverse events by gender following cardiac catheterization. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:125–31

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Walker SB,
    2. Cleary S,
    3. Higgins M

    . Comparison of the FemoStop device and manual pressure in reducing groin puncture site complications following coronary angioplasty and coronary stent placement. Int J Nurs Pract 2001;7:366–75

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Semler HJ

    . Transfemoral catheterization: mechanical versus manual control of bleeding. Radiology 1985;154:234–35

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Das R,
    2. Ahmed K,
    3. Athanasiou T,
    4. et al

    . Arterial closure devices versus manual compression for femoral haemostasis in interventional radiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;34:723–38

    CrossRefPubMed