Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLETTER

Rehashing Trial Results Won't Help with Puzzling Aneurysms–Patients Need Best Care within a Contemporary Trial

T.E. Darsaut and J. Raymond
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2013, 34 (8) E94-E95; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3652
T.E. Darsaut
aUniversity of Alberta Hospital Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Raymond
bCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Notre-Dame Hospital Department of Radiology Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lanzino G,
    2. Murad MH,
    3. d'Urso PI,
    4. et al
    . Coil embolization versus clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled published studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013 Apr. 11. [Epub ahead of print]
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sellar RJ,
    2. White P
    . Best evidence: comments on meta-analysis of coiling versus clipping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013 Apr 4. [Epub ahead of print]
  3. 3.↵
    1. Koivisto T,
    2. Vanninen R,
    3. Hurskainen H,
    4. et al
    . Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. Stroke 2000;31:2369–77
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Molyneux A,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Stratton I,
    4. et al
    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. McDougall CG,
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. Zabramski JM,
    4. et al
    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Moher D,
    2. Liberati A,
    3. Tetzlaff J,
    4. et al.
    , the PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535
    FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ludbrook J
    . Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design. Int J Epidemiol 2008;37:1430–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Findlay JM,
    3. Raymond J
    , CURES Collaborative Group. The design of the Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular versus Surgery (CURES) trial. Can J Neurol Sci 2011;38:236–41
    PubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Kotowski M,
    3. Darsaut TE,
    4. et al
    . Ruptured aneurysms and the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): what is known and what remains to be questioned. Neurochirurgie 2012;58:103–08
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Jack A,
    3. Kerr RS,
    4. et al.
    , for the ISAT-II Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial – ISAT Part II: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:156
    CrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 8
1 Aug 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rehashing Trial Results Won't Help with Puzzling Aneurysms–Patients Need Best Care within a Contemporary Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rehashing Trial Results Won't Help with Puzzling Aneurysms–Patients Need Best Care within a Contemporary Trial
T.E. Darsaut, J. Raymond
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2013, 34 (8) E94-E95; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3652

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Rehashing Trial Results Won't Help with Puzzling Aneurysms–Patients Need Best Care within a Contemporary Trial
T.E. Darsaut, J. Raymond
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2013, 34 (8) E94-E95; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3652
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Reply:
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply
  • 2018–2022 Radiology Residency and Neuroradiology Fellowship Match Data: Preferences and Success Rates of Applicants
  • The Nosologic Term “Conversive” Disorder Should Be Abandoned
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire