Imaging Biomarkers in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Wardlaw JM

   . Surrogate outcomes: a cautionary note. Stroke 2009;40:1029–31

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Wintermark M,
   3. Albers GW,
   4. Broderick JP, et al

   . Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap II. Stroke 2013;44:2628–39

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Wintermark M,
   3. Sanelli PC,
   4. Albers GW, et al

   . Imaging recommendations for acute stroke and transient ischemic attack patients: a joint statement by the American Society of Neuroradiology, the American College of Radiology, and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:E117–27

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Vahedi K,
   3. Vicaut E,
   4. Mateo J, et al

   . Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL Trial). Stroke 2007;38:2506–17

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Parsons M,
   3. Spratt N,
   4. Bivard A, et al

   . A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1099–107

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Parsons MW,
   3. Christensen S,
   4. McElduff P, et al

   . Pretreatment diffusion- and perfusion-MR lesion volumes have a crucial influence on clinical response to stroke thrombolysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30:1214–25

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Nagakane Y,
   3. Christensen S,
   4. Brekenfeld C, et al

   . EPITHET: positive result after reanalysis using baseline diffusion-weighted imaging/perfusion-weighted imaging co-registration. Stroke 2011;42:59–64

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Barber PA,
   3. Demchuk AM,
   4. Zhang J, et al

   . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy: ASPECTS Study Group—Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Inoue M,
   3. Mlynash M,
   4. Christensen S, et al

   . Early diffusion-weighted imaging reversal after endovascular reperfusion is typically transient in patients imaged 3 to 6 hours after onset. Stroke 2014;45:1024–28

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Neumann AB,
    3. Jonsdottir KY,
    4. Mouridsen K, et al

    . Interrater agreement for final infarct MRI lesion delineation. Stroke 2009;40:3768–71

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. González RG,
    3. Schaefer PW,
    4. Buonanno FS, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology 1999;210:155–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. González RG

    . Low signal, high noise and large uncertainty make CT perfusion unsuitable for acute ischemic stroke patient selection for endovascular therapy. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:242–45

    FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Tu HT,
    4. Christensen S, et al

    . Assessing response to stroke thrombolysis: validation of 24-hour multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 2012;69:46–50

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Ay H,
    3. Arsava EM,
    4. Vangel M, et al

    . Interexaminer difference in infarct volume measurements on MRI: a source of variance in stroke research. Stroke 2008;39:1171–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kidwell CS,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. Gornbein J, et al

    . A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Powers WJ

    . Intravenous thrombolysis of basilar artery thrombosis. Ann Neurol 2014;75:456–57
17. 17.↵
    National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–87

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Patel SC,
    3. Levine SR,
    4. Tilley BC, et al

    . Lack of clinical significance of early ischemic changes on computed tomography in acute stroke. JAMA 2001;286:2830–38

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Lansberg MG,
    3. Straka M,
    4. Kemp S, et al

    . MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Simonsen CZ,
    3. Sørensen LH,
    4. Karabegovic S, et al

    . MRI before intraarterial therapy in ischemic stroke: feasibility, impact, and safety. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014;34:1076–81

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Wisco D,
    3. Uchino K,
    4. Saqqur M, et al

    . Addition of hyperacute MRI aids in patient selection, decreasing the use of endovascular stroke therapy. Stroke 2014;45:467–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Verduzco LA,
    4. Schaefer PW, et al

    . MRI-based selection for intra-arterial stroke therapy: value of pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume in selecting patients with acute stroke who will benefit from early recanalization. Stroke 2009;40:2046–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Broderick JP,
    3. Palesch YY,
    4. Demchuk AM, et al

    . Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Tzoulaki I,
    3. Siontis KC,
    4. Evangelou E, et al

    . Bias in associations of emerging biomarkers with cardiovascular disease. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:664–71

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Rothwell PM

    . Treating individuals 2: subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet 2005;365:176–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Tomsick T

    . TIMI, TIBI, TICI: I came, I saw, I got confused. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:382–84

    FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    European Society of Radiology. White paper on imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 2010;1:42–45

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Kessler LG,
    3. Barnhart HX,
    4. Buckler AJ, et al

    . The emerging science of quantitative imaging biomarkers terminology and definitions for scientific studies and regulatory submissions. Stat Methods Med Res 2015;24:9–26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text