Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleEXTRACRANIAL VASCULAR
Open Access

Characterization of Craniocervical Artery Dissection by Simultaneous MR Noncontrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging at 3T

Q. Li, J. Wang, H. Chen, X. Gong, N. Ma, K. Gao, L. He, M. Guan, Z. Chen, R. Li, D. Mi, C. Yuan, X. Zhao and X.H. Zhao
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1769-1775; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4348
Q. Li
aFrom the Departments of Neurology (Q.L., X.G., D.M., X.Z.)
cDepartment of Neurology (Q.L.), People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Wang
dClinical Sites Research Program (J.W.), Philips Research North America, Briarcliff Manor, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Chen
eDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (H.C., L.H., Z.C., R.L., C.Y., X.H.Z.), Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Gong
aFrom the Departments of Neurology (Q.L., X.G., D.M., X.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Ma
bInterventional Neuroradiology (N.M., K.G.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Gao
bInterventional Neuroradiology (N.M., K.G.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. He
eDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (H.C., L.H., Z.C., R.L., C.Y., X.H.Z.), Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Guan
fDepartment of Radiology (M.G.), Yangzhou First People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Z. Chen
eDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (H.C., L.H., Z.C., R.L., C.Y., X.H.Z.), Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Li
eDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (H.C., L.H., Z.C., R.L., C.Y., X.H.Z.), Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Mi
aFrom the Departments of Neurology (Q.L., X.G., D.M., X.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Yuan
eDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (H.C., L.H., Z.C., R.L., C.Y., X.H.Z.), Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China
gDepartment of Radiology (C.Y.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Zhao
aFrom the Departments of Neurology (Q.L., X.G., D.M., X.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X.H. Zhao
eDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (H.C., L.H., Z.C., R.L., C.Y., X.H.Z.), Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Craniocervical artery dissection is the most common cause of ischemic stroke identified in young adults. For the diagnosis of craniocervical artery dissection, multisequence MR imaging is recommended but is time-consuming. Recently, investigators proposed a simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging technique allowing simultaneous noncontrast MRA and vessel wall imaging in a single scan. This study sought to investigate the feasibility of 3D simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage MR imaging in the characterization of craniocervical artery dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four symptomatic patients (mean age, 45.0 ± 16.1 years; 21 men) with suspected craniocervical artery dissection were recruited. The 3D simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage 3D TOF MRA and black-blood imaging sequences were performed on a 3T MR imaging scanner. The agreement between simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging and multisequence MR imaging in evaluating arterial dissection was determined.

RESULTS: Dissection was found to involve 1 artery in 22 patients and 2 arteries in 2 patients. The intramural hematoma and luminal occlusion were detected in 19 (79.2%) and 11 (45.8%) patients, respectively. In measuring stenosis, the Cohen κ value between 3D TOF MRA and simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging was 0.82 (P < .001). All intramural hematomas on multisequence imaging were successfully identified by simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging.

CONCLUSIONS: 3D simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging showed excellent agreement with multisequence MR imaging in evaluating luminal stenosis and intramural hematoma in patients with craniocervical artery dissection. The simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging saved nearly 50% of scanning time compared with multisequence MR imaging. Our findings suggest that 3D simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging might be an alternative, time-efficient diagnostic tool for craniocervical artery dissection.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CCAD
craniocervical artery dissection
IMH
intramural hematoma
MERGE
Multi-Echo Recombined Gradient Echo
SNAP
simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage

Craniocervical artery dissection (CCAD) is the most common cause of stroke identified in young and middle-aged adults.1,2 Pathophysiologically, arterial dissections occur when a tear develops in ≥1 layer of the vessel wall, allowing blood to enter the wall and split the layers; this condition is characterized by a cavity or intramural hematoma (IMH).3 The increased volume of the IMH may narrow or occlude the lumen, and it can also damage the intima and trigger thrombosis. Because this arterial disorder is strongly associated with acute ischemic events,4,5 it is clinically preferable to diagnose CCAD at the early stages so that clinicians can properly treat and prevent potential neurologic complications.6

Angiographic imaging modalities, such as CTA, MRA, and DSA, have been widely used for the diagnosis of CCAD in clinical settings.7⇓–9 These approaches can only provide the information of luminal narrowing or occlusion but are unable to directly delineate IMH, which is a key sign of CCAD. Some investigators believe that craniocervical arteries with occlusion but without evidence of IMH cannot be diagnosed as dissection unless the dissected wall is completely recanalized.10 MR vessel wall imaging has been increasingly used for the diagnosis of CCAD due to its capability of directly visualizing IMH in the vessel wall.11⇓–13 Recently, a multisequence MR imaging protocol, which includes both MRA and MR vessel wall imaging sequences, was recommended for the diagnosis of CCAD.10 However, this protocol needs independent acquisition of 2 different time-consuming MR imaging sequences.

Most recently, a simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) MR imaging technique has been proposed for the evaluation of vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaques.14 The major advantage of the 3D SNAP imaging sequence is acquiring noncontrast MRA and vessel wall images simultaneously in a single scan. The vessel wall images derived from the 3D SNAP sequence carry heavy T1-weighting, which is very sensitive to intraplaque hemorrhage or IMH. The other advantages of SNAP imaging include fast scanning, large longitudinal coverage (up to 250 mm), and isotropic high resolution (0.8 mm3). Those advantages make SNAP an ideal candidate for quick and reliable identification of dissection, particularly for tortuous craniocervical arteries with longer lesions.

We hypothesized that the 3D SNAP MR imaging technique is capable of characterizing CCAD by providing both luminal and vessel wall information simultaneously. In this study, we sought to evaluate the feasibility of 3D SNAP MR imaging in the diagnosis of CCAD.

Materials and Methods

Participants

Patients with recent ischemic cerebrovascular symptoms (within 2 weeks) and with suspected craniocervical artery dissection were prospectively and consecutively recruited in this study. The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) recent ischemic symptoms and/or neck pain and/or headache; 2) MR angiography revealing stenosis with a string sign or total occlusion or a double lumen or luminal dilation (pseudoaneurysm).15 The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) subjects with evidence of cardiogenic ischemic stroke, 2) subjects with evidence of cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease according to traditional imaging examinations, and 3) subjects with contraindications to MR imaging. The clinical characteristics, including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia, were collected. The study protocol was approved by the local institutional review board before the initiation of this study, and written consent forms were obtained from all subjects.

MR Imaging

All subjects underwent MR imaging on a 3T Achieva TX scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with a custom-designed 36-channel neurovascular coil.16 The multisequence MR imaging, including 3D TOF MRA and 3D Multi-Echo Recombined Gradient Echo (MERGE; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin), was performed with the following parameters: 3D TOF MRA, turbo field echo; TR/TE, 25/3.5 ms; flip angle, 20°; FOV, 180 × 180 × 84 mm3 for intracranial arteries and 130 × 168 × 140 mm3 for carotid arteries; voxel size, 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.7 mm3 for intracranial arteries and 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.9 mm3 for carotid arteries; total scanning time, 9 minutes; 3D MERGE, turbo field echo; TR/TE, 9.2/4.3 ms; flip angle, 6°; FOV, 250 × 160 × 40 mm3; scanning time, 4 minutes 6 seconds. In this study, the presence of IMH was determined by 3D MERGE images when lesions appeared hyperintense because the imaging sequence MERGE has T1 contrast-weighting and has the potential to identify intraplaque hemorrhage.17 In contrast, the 3D SNAP imaging sequence was acquired with the following parameters: 3D SNAP, turbo field echo sequence; TR/TE, 10/4.8 ms; flip angle, 11°/5°; FOV, 250 × 160 × 32 mm3; voxel size, 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 mm3; scanning time, 6 minutes 45 seconds. The 3D SNAP and MERGE images were acquired in the coronal direction, and 3D TOF MRA images were acquired in the axial direction. Both extracranial carotid arteries and intracranial arteries were covered on MR imaging.

Image Interpretation

The 3D TOF MRA, MERGE, and SNAP images were reconstructed by using maximum intensity projection, minimum intensity projection, and MPR at the workstation Extended MR WorkSpace (Version 2.0.3.3; Philips Healthcare). A color-coded algorithm was used to create 3D maximum intensity projection images from SNAP images for joint display of luminal changes and the components with hyperintense signal in the vessel wall.14 Blinded to clinical information and SNAP images, 2 reviewers evaluated with consensus the degree of luminal stenosis on 3D TOF MRA images and the presence or absence of IMH, which is defined as hyperintense signal in the vessel wall on 3D MERGE images. The diagnosis of IMH was made when the signal intensity of the vessel wall was 2 times as high as the reference tissue of muscle. The other 2 reviewers measured the luminal stenosis on noncontrast MRA derived from SNAP images and identified the presence or absence of IMH on vessel wall images from SNAP imaging blinded to clinical information and 3D TOF MRA and MERGE image findings. Luminal stenosis was measured by using the NASCET method.18 All observers were neuroradiologists and had >3 years' experience in cerebrovascular imaging. The luminal stenosis was divided into the following categories: mild stenosis (<50%), moderate stenosis (50%–70%), severe stenosis (70%–99%), and occlusion (100%). The presence or absence of pseudoaneurysm, double lumen and intimal flaps, and lesion length was also assessed.

Statistical Analysis

The continuous variables were described as mean ± SD, and categoric ones were presented as absolute frequencies or percentages. The Cohen κ was used for evaluating the agreement between 3D TOF MRA and SNAP imaging in measuring luminal stenosis. The agreement between 3D SNAP and 3D MERGE in the identification of IMH, pseudoaneurysm, intimal flaps, and double lumen was also determined. A P value of <.05 was statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York).

Results

In total, 24 patients (mean age, 45.0 ± 16.1 years; 21 men) were recruited for this study between June 2012 and September 2014. Of the 24 patients, 4 (16.7%) presented with headache, 3 (12.5%) presented with neck pain, 20 (83.3%) had ischemic stroke, and 4 (16.7%) had TIA. All patients denied blunt traumatic injury to the head and neck. The clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Clinical characteristics of study population

Characteristics on Multisequence 3D MR Imaging

The characteristics of each subject on multisequence MR images are shown in Table 2. Twenty-two patients developed dissection in 1 artery, and 2 patients had dissection in 2 arteries. The dissection involvement in different vascular beds was as follows: 3 (12.5%) in the common carotid artery, 8 (33.3%) in the C1 segment of the internal carotid arteries, 3 (12.5%) in the middle cerebral artery, 6 (25%) in the basilar artery, and 6 (25%) in the vertebral artery. IMHs were detected in 19 (79.2%) patients. In arteries with dissection, we found no luminal changes (stenosis or dilation) in 3 (12.5%) patients, mild stenosis in 2 (8.3%) patients, moderate stenosis in 3 (12.5%) patients, severe stenosis in 3 (12.5%) patients, and occlusion in 11 (45.8%) patients. The pattern of pseudoaneurysm and intimal flaps and double lumen was observed in 2 (8.3%) and 3 (16.7%) patients, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Characteristics of 24 patients with CCAD on multisequence MR imaging

Agreement between 3D SNAP and Multisequence 3D MR Imaging

In measuring luminal stenosis of diseased arteries, the Cohen κ value between 3D TOF MRA and SNAP imaging was 0.82 (P < .001). Figure 1 demonstrates mild stenosis in the basilar artery on the MRA image derived from SNAP imaging (Fig 1A), corresponding to the TOF MRA image (Fig 1B), while the hyperintense signal on the SNAP vessel wall image (Fig 1C) indicates IMH. One patient with mild stenosis on 3D TOF MRA was classified as having moderate stenosis by SNAP imaging, and 2 patients with severe stenosis on 3D TOF MRA were diagnosed as having occlusion. All IMHs on multisequence imaging were successfully identified by SNAP imaging. IMH appeared hyperintense on the 3D SNAP image, corresponding to the 3D MERGE images (Fig 2). In addition, the characteristics of pseudoaneurysm, intimal flaps, and double lumen on multisequence imaging were also accurately determined by SNAP imaging (Fig 3). Figure 4 is an example of the excellent joint visualization of luminal changes and IMH in the vessel wall on SNAP images after color-coded reconstruction.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Excellent agreement between SNAP imaging and TOF MRA in measuring stenosis. Mild stenosis in the basilar artery is determined by MRA images derived from SNAP imaging (A), which corresponds to the TOF MRA image (B). The hyperintense signal on the SNAP vessel wall image (C) indicates intramural hematoma.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

SNAP imaging depicts intramural hematoma. The intramural hematoma in the internal carotid artery appears hyperintense on both 3D MERGE (A, white arrows) and SNAP images (B, white arrows).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

SNAP imaging delineates the intimal flaps. The SNAP MRA image (A) shows a dilated lumen (pseudoaneurysm) in the internal carotid artery. The intimal flaps (hollow arrow) and double lumen (white arrow) are noted on vessel wall images derived from SNAP imaging in the coronal (B) and axial (C) views after MPR reconstruction. The white line on the coronal view indicates the location of the axial view acquisition.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

The luminal narrowing and intramural hematoma are jointly visualized in a single SNAP image. Total occlusion in the internal carotid artery is demonstrated by TOF MRA (A, hollow arrow) and SNAP MRA (C, hollow arrow). A vessel wall image (B) derived from SNAP imaging shows a hyperintense lesion in the vessel wall (white arrows), indicating intramural hematoma. The intramural hematoma is well-depicted by maximum intensity projection of SNAP images (D). The MRA and vessel wall images derived from SNAP imaging are naturally registered to jointly visualize luminal narrowing and intramural hematoma in red (E) after color-coded processing.

Discussion

This study investigated the feasibility of 3D SNAP imaging in characterizing CCAD. We found that 3D SNAP imaging showed excellent agreement with multisequence 3D MR imaging in measuring luminal stenosis and identification of IMH. In addition, 20.8% (5/24) of patients developed no or mild stenosis and 79.2% (19/24) of patients had IMH, indicating the importance of delineating wall changes by vessel wall imaging in the diagnosis of dissection. Because SNAP imaging provides noncontrast MRA and vessel wall images simultaneously with large longitudinal coverage and much shorter scanning time, it might be an alternative, time-efficient diagnostic tool for characterization of CCAD compared with multisequence 3D MR imaging.

We found that noncontrast MRA images derived from SNAP imaging showed excellent agreement with 3D TOF MRA in evaluating the luminal stenosis in patients with craniocervical artery dissection. Our findings are consistent with those in previous studies. Wang et al14 demonstrated that there was significant correlation between SNAP imaging and TOF MRA in the quantification of the lumen area of carotid arteries (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94–0.97). Previous study14 has also shown that the SNAP image will generate a smaller lumen size compared with TOF MRA when the lumen area is <20 mm2, indicating that it may overestimate the degree of stenosis at the arterial segment with a naturally small lumen size or severe luminal narrowing. Similarly, the luminal stenosis measured by SNAP images was overestimated compared with 3D TOF MRA in 3 arteries. In addition, the SNAP technique does not require contrast injection, so it can be used in patients with poor intravenous access or contraindications to gadolinium contrast administration (eg, pregnancy or renal failure). Our results indicate that noncontrast MRA derived from SNAP imaging might be an alternative approach for assessing the luminal changes in arterial dissection.

All the IMHs of this study population were successfully detected by 3D SNAP imaging. The IMH exhibited hyperintense signals on SNAP images, indicating the component with a short T1. It has been shown that the SNAP imaging sequence increased the contrast between hemorrhage and the vessel wall by another 35%, which allows more detection of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage compared with the widely used 3D magnetization prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo sequence.14 In previous studies, the IMH was evaluated by 2D T1-weighted MR imaging with fat saturation.11⇓–13 However, acquisition of 2D T1-weighted images is time-consuming and has limited longitudinal coverage. Recently, the 3D black-blood T1-weighted imaging technique has been used to detect IMH in patients with arterial dissection.19⇓–21 Taking advantage of large coverage, black-blood effect, and high spatial resolution, 3D black-blood imaging sequences seem to be a substitute for 2D imaging techniques. Similar to the 3D T1-weighted imaging sequences, 3D SNAP imaging techniques enable fast and high-resolution imaging with large longitudinal coverage of up to 250 mm. Benefiting from the large coverage of SNAP imaging, the extent of IMHs, particularly those involving multiple vascular beds, can be delineated.

In the present study, a substantial number of patients only had intimal flaps and double lumen without evidence of luminal stenosis and IMH. The intimal flaps and double lumen were successfully depicted on the vessel wall images derived from SNAP imaging in this study. Similar to luminal narrowing and IMH, these characteristics are important evidence for the diagnosis of dissection. It has been shown that these patterns exist when patients developed complete recanalization after dissection, but they were only seen in approximately 10% of cases.22 Our findings suggest that SNAP imaging might be a useful tool for comprehensive evaluation of CCAD.

For the diagnosis of arterial dissection, SNAP imaging seems to be a time-efficient approach that saves nearly 50% of scanning time compared with the recommended multisequence imaging protocol with 2 separate sequences (MRA and MR vessel wall imaging). This difference is because the 3D SNAP imaging can provide noncontrast MRA and vessel wall images simultaneously in a single scan in a much shorter scanning time. On the other hand, the MRA and vessel wall images generated from SNAP imaging are intrinsically registered by avoiding the misregistration between images acquired from 2 independent sequences. SNAP imaging enables joint visualization of the lumen and arterial wall changes at a single image. The assessment of the location of the relationship between the lumen and vessel wall in arteries with dissection might be useful for treatment planning of revascularization. Although SNAP imaging is capable of identifying CCAD comprehensively, multisequence MR imaging techniques might be needed in some complicated cases.

In this study, a custom-designed 36-channel coil was used to acquire intracranial and extracranial vessel wall images simultaneously. Compared with a commercialized neurovascular coil, this coil allows large-coverage MR imaging with a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio due to the dedicated coil elements for extracranial carotid arteries. The design of this 36-channel coil might be desirable for assessment of the arterial dissection, particularly for lesions involving a large extent of vessel wall or multiple vessels (carotid arteries and vertebral arteries) simultaneously.

Our study has several limitations. First, the sample size of this study was small, and all patients were suspected of having dissection. Future studies with a large sample size and a broad spectrum of disease should be conducted. Second, to determine the feasibility of SNAP imaging in the detection of IMH, the 3D MERGE imaging sequence was considered as a reference technique. This may decrease the specificity of identifying IMH because 3D MERGE introduces both T1- and T2-contrast-weighting during imaging. Finally, the signal pattern of IMH on SNAP imaging was obtained at only 1 time point. Previous studies reported that the signal of IMH will change with time on MR vessel wall imaging.13,22 To evaluate the usefulness of SNAP imaging in the characterization of CCAD, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Conclusions

We found 3D SNAP imaging to have excellent agreement with multisequence MR imaging in the assessment of luminal stenosis and intramural hematoma in patients with CCAD. Our findings suggest that benefiting from fast imaging with large longitudinal coverage, 3D SNAP imaging might be an alternative, time-efficient diagnostic tool for CCAD compared with multisequence MR imaging.

Footnotes

  • Drs Xi Hai Zhao and Xingquan Zhao are co-corresponding authors who contributed equally to this study.

  • Disclosures: Jinnan Wang—UNRELATED: Employment: Philips Research North America, Comments: full-time employee; Huijun Chen—RELATED: Grant: National Natural Science Foundation of China (research grants); UNRELATED: Philips Healthcare (research grants).* Chun Yuan—RELATED: Grant: Philips Healthcare,* National Institutes of Health,* UNRELATED: Consultancy: Philips Healthcare, Comments: I am a member of the Radiology Medical Advisory Network of Philips Healthcare; Patents (planned, pending or issued): A patent was filed for the imaging technique used in this study.* *Money paid to the institution.

  • This study was supported in part by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271536), a grant from the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (D111107003111007), and Philips Healthcare.

  • Paper previously presented in part at: Annual International Workshop on Magnetic Resonance Angiography, August 20–23, 2013; New York, New York.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Leys D,
    2. Bandu L,
    3. Hénon H, et al
    . Clinical outcome in 287 consecutive young adults (15 to 45 years) with ischemic stroke. Neurology 2002;59:26–33
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ducrocq X,
    2. Lacour JC,
    3. Debouverie M, et al
    . Cerebral ischemic accidents in young subjects: a prospective study of 296 patients aged 16 to 45 years. Rev Neurol 1999;155:575–82
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schievink WI
    . Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 2001;344:898–906
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Benninger DH,
    2. Georgiadis D,
    3. Kremer C, et al
    . Mechanism of ischemic infarct in spontaneous carotid dissection. Stroke 2004;35:482–85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dziewas R,
    2. Konrad C,
    3. Dräger B, et al
    . Cervical artery dissection–clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients. J Neurol 2003;250:1179–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Biousse V,
    2. D'Anglejan-Chatillon J,
    3. Touboul PJ, et al
    . Time course of symptoms in extracranial carotid artery dissections: a series of 80 patients. Stroke 1995;26:235–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sturzenegger M,
    2. Mattle HP,
    3. Rivoir A, et al
    . Ultrasound findings in carotid artery dissection: analysis of 43 patients. Neurology 1995;45:691–98
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Leclerc X,
    2. Godefroy O,
    3. Salhi A, et al
    . Helical CT for the diagnosis of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. Stroke 1996;27:461–66
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lévy C,
    2. Laissy JP,
    3. Raveau V, et al
    . Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography. Radiology 1994;190:97–103
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Debette S,
    2. Leys D
    . Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:668–78
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ozdoba C,
    2. Sturzenegger M,
    3. Schroth G
    . Internal carotid artery dissection: MR imaging features and clinical-radiologic correlation. Radiology 1996;199:191–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Rodallec MH,
    2. Marteau V,
    3. Gerber S, et al
    . Craniocervical arterial dissection: spectrum of imaging findings and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2008;28:1711–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Goldberg HI,
    2. Grossman RI,
    3. Gomori JM, et al
    . Cervical internal carotid artery dissecting hemorrhage: diagnosis using MR. Radiology 1986;158:157–61
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Börnert P,
    3. Zhao H, et al
    . Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging for carotid atherosclerotic disease evaluation. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:337–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Patel RR,
    2. Adam R,
    3. Maldjian C, et al
    . Cervical carotid artery dissection: current review of diagnosis and treatment. Cardiol Rev 2012;20:145–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Li R,
    3. Hayes C, et al
    . A new designed 36-channel neurovascular coil at 3T. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Melbourne, Australia. May 5–11, 2012;21:2787
  17. 17.↵
    1. Balu N,
    2. Yarnykh VL,
    3. Chu B, et al
    . Carotid plaque assessment using fast 3D isotropic resolution black-blood MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:627–37
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Cuvinciuc V,
    2. Viallon M,
    3. Momjian-Mayor I, et al
    . 3D fat-saturated T1 SPACE sequence for the diagnosis of cervical artery dissection. Neuroradiology 2013;55:595–602
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Edjlali M,
    2. Roca P,
    3. Rabrait C, et al
    . 3D fast spin-echo T1 black-blood imaging for the diagnosis of cervical artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:E103–06
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Takano K,
    2. Yamashita S,
    3. Takemoto K, et al
    . MRI of intracranial vertebral artery dissection: evaluation of intramural haematoma using a black blood, variable-flip-angle 3D turbo spin-echo sequence. Neuroradiology 2013;55:845–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Flis CM,
    2. Jager HR,
    3. Sidhu PS
    . Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: clinical aspects, imaging features and endovascular treatment. Eur Radiol 2007;17:820–34
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received October 30, 2014.
  • Accepted after revision February 13, 2015.
  • © 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 9
1 Sep 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of Craniocervical Artery Dissection by Simultaneous MR Noncontrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging at 3T
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Characterization of Craniocervical Artery Dissection by Simultaneous MR Noncontrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging at 3T
Q. Li, J. Wang, H. Chen, X. Gong, N. Ma, K. Gao, L. He, M. Guan, Z. Chen, R. Li, D. Mi, C. Yuan, X. Zhao, X.H. Zhao
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2015, 36 (9) 1769-1775; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4348

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Characterization of Craniocervical Artery Dissection by Simultaneous MR Noncontrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging at 3T
Q. Li, J. Wang, H. Chen, X. Gong, N. Ma, K. Gao, L. He, M. Guan, Z. Chen, R. Li, D. Mi, C. Yuan, X. Zhao, X.H. Zhao
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2015, 36 (9) 1769-1775; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4348
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 3D T1-weighted black blood sequence at 3.0 Tesla for the diagnosis of cervical artery dissection
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

EXTRACRANIAL VASCULAR

  • Value of Emergent Neurovascular Imaging for “Seat Belt Injury”: A Multi-institutional Study
  • Variations in the Course of the Carotid Arteries in Patients with Retropharyngeal Parathyroid Adenomas
  • Low-Dose Eptifibatide for Tandem Occlusion in Stroke: Safety and Carotid Artery Patency
Show more EXTRACRANIAL VASCULAR

HEAD & NECK

  • Optimal Duration of MRI Follow-up to Safely Identify Middle Ear Residual Cholesteatoma
  • Variations in the Course of the Carotid Arteries in Patients with Retropharyngeal Parathyroid Adenomas
  • Postoperative Imaging Appearance of Iliac Crest Free Flaps Used for Palatomaxillary Reconstructions
Show more HEAD & NECK

INTERVENTIONAL

  • Flow-Diversion Treatment for Unruptured ICA Bifurcation Aneurysms with Unfavorable Morphology for Coiling
  • Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis after Unsuccessful Mechanical Thrombectomy in the STRATIS Registry
  • Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data
Show more INTERVENTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire