Diagnostic Impact of Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography for Patients with Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Connolly ES Jr.,
   3. Rabinstein AA,
   4. Carhuapoma JR, et al

   ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2012;43:1711–37 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839 pmid:22556195

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Dawkins AA,
   3. Evans AL,
   4. Wattam J, et al

   . Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology 2007;49:753–59 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0252-y pmid:17594083

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Fifi JT,
   3. Meyers PM,
   4. Lavine SD, et al

   . Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:442–47 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.012 pmid:19246211

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Velthuis BK,
   3. Van Leeuwen MS,
   4. Witkamp TD, et al

   . Computerized tomography angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: from aneurysm detection to treatment without conventional angiography. J Neurosurg 1999;91:761–67 doi:10.3171/jns.1999.91.5.0761 pmid:10541232

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Rinkel GJ,
   3. van Gijn J,
   4. Wijdicks EF

   . Subarachnoid hemorrhage without detectable aneurysm: a review of the causes. Stroke 1993;24:1403–09 doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.9.1403 pmid:8362440

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Saitoh H,
   3. Hayakawa K,
   4. Nishimura K, et al

   . Rerupture of cerebral aneurysms during angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:539–42 pmid:7793379

   Abstract
7. 7.↵
   2. Li Q,
   3. Lv F,
   4. Li Y, et al

   . Evaluation of 64-section CT angiography for detection and treatment planning of intracranial aneurysms by using DSA and surgical findings. Radiology 2009;252:808–15 doi:10.1148/radiol.2523081911 pmid:19508992

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Zhang LJ,
   3. Wu SY,
   4. Niu JB, et al

   . Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:23–30 doi:10.2214/AJR.08.2290 pmid:20028901

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Zhang LJ,
   3. Wu SY,
   4. Poon CS, et al

   . Automatic bone removal dual-energy CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:816–24 doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181eff93c pmid:21084894

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Menke J,
    3. Larsen J,
    4. Kallenberg K

    . Diagnosing cerebral aneurysms by computed tomographic angiography: meta-analysis. Ann Neurol 2011;69:646–54 doi:10.1002/ana.22270 pmid:21391230

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Lu L,
    3. Zhang LJ,
    4. Poon CS, et al

    . Digital subtraction CT angiography for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2012;262:605–12 doi:10.1148/radiol.11110486 pmid:22143927

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Chen W,
    3. Xing W,
    4. Peng Y, et al

    . Cerebral aneurysms: accuracy of 320-detector row nonsubtracted and subtracted volumetric CT angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 2013;269:841–49 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130191 pmid:24009353

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Papke K,
    3. Kuhl CK,
    4. Fruth M, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: role of multidetector CT angiography in diagnosis and endovascular therapy planning. Radiology 2007;244:532–40 doi:10.1148/radiol.2442060394 pmid:17641372

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Westerlaan HE,
    3. van Dijk JMC,
    4. van Dijk MJ, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT angiography as a primary examination tool for diagnosis–systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011;258:134–45 doi:10.1148/radiol.10092373 pmid:20935079

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Agid R,
    3. Willinsky RA,
    4. Farb RI, et al

    . Life at the end of the tunnel: why emergent CT angiography should be done for patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:e45; author reply e46–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1014 pmid:18372410

    FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Symons SP,
    4. Aviv RI

    . CT angiography is state-of-the-art first vascular imaging for subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:e41–42; author reply e46–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1049 pmid:18372411

    FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. McKinney AM,
    3. Palmer CS,
    4. Truwit CL, et al

    . Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:594–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0848 pmid:18065510

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Donmez H,
    3. Serifov E,
    4. Kahriman G, et al

    . Comparison of 16-row multislice CT angiography with conventional angiography for detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:455–61 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.012 pmid:20729022

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Romijn M,
    3. Gratama van Andel HA,
    4. van Walderveen MA, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:134–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0741 pmid:17928381

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Li Q,
    3. Lv F,
    4. Li Y, et al

    . Subtraction CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with conventional CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2261–67 doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1416-4 pmid:19408001

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. Kallmes DF

    . Difficult aneurysms for endovascular treatment: overwide or undertall? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1513–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1633 pmid:19461057

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Lell MM,
    3. Ruehm SG,
    4. Kramer M, et al

    . Cranial computed tomography angiography with automated bone subtraction: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2009;44:38–43 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31818c3d6b pmid:18836384

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Lell M,
    3. Anders K,
    4. Klotz E, et al

    . Clinical evaluation of bone-subtraction CT angiography (BSCTA) in head and neck imaging. Eur Radiol 2006;16:889–97 doi:10.1007/s0330-005-0032-1 pmid:16267665

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Morhard D,
    3. Fink C,
    4. Becker C, et al

    . Value of automatic bone subtraction in cranial CT angiography: comparison of bone-subtracted vs. standard CT angiography in 100 patients. Eur Radiol 2008;18:974–82 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0855-7 pmid:18224325

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Agid R,
    3. Andersson T,
    4. Almqvist H, et al

    . Negative CT angiography findings in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: when is digital subtraction angiography still needed? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:696–705 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1884 pmid:19942709

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Yoon DY,
    3. Lim KJ,
    4. Choi CS, et al

    . Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with 16-channel multidetector row CT angiography: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:60–67 pmid:17213425

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Agid R,
    3. Lee SK,
    4. Willinsky RA, et al

    . Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: using 64-slice multidetector CT angiography to “triage” patients' treatment. Neuroradiology 2006;48:787–94 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0129-5 pmid:17009025

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Lell MM,
    3. Anders K,
    4. Uder M, et al

    . New techniques in CT angiography. Radiographics 2006;26(suppl 1):S45–62 doi:10.1148/rg.26si065508 pmid:17050518

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Li B,
    3. Toth TL,
    4. Hsieh J, et al

    . Simulation and analysis of image quality impacts from single source, ultra-wide coverage CT scanner. J Xray Sci Technol 2012;20:395–404 doi:10.3233/XST-2012-00347 pmid:23324781

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Boas FE,
    3. Fleischmann D

    . CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imaging Med 2012;4:229–40 doi:10.2217/iim.12.13

    CrossRef
31. 31.↵
    2. Gonzalez N,
    3. Sedrak M,
    4. Martin N, et al

    . Impact of anatomic features in the endovascular embolization of 181 anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Stroke 2008;39:2776–82 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505222 pmid:18617670

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cloft H,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Comparison of 2D digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation of dome-to-neck ratio. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:831–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1444 pmid:19131410

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Hayashida E,
    3. Sasao A,
    4. Hirai T, et al

    . Can sufficient preoperative information of intracranial aneurysms be obtained by using 320-row detector CT angiography alone? Jpn J Radiol 2013;31:600–07 doi:10.1007/s11604-013-0228-2 pmid:23771696

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Gelfand AA,
    3. Josephson SA

    . Substantial radiation exposure for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;20:131–33 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.11.011 pmid:20621510

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 1999
36. 36.↵
    2. Westerlaan HE,
    3. Gravendeel J,
    4. Fiore D, et al

    . Multislice CT angiography in the selection of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms suitable for clipping or coiling. Neuroradiology 2007;49:997–1007 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0293-2 pmid:17891387

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Venema HW,
    3. Hulsmans FJ,
    4. den Heeten GJ

    . CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study. Radiology 2001;218:893–98 doi:10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr30893 pmid:11230672

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Tomandl BF,
    3. Hammen T,
    4. Klotz E, et al

    . Bone-subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:55–59 pmid:16418356

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. Huang A,
    3. Lee CW,
    4. Yang CY, et al

    . Using standard nonenhanced axial scans for cerebral CT angiography bone elimination: feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2010;45:225–32 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181d4a010 pmid:20351654

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Lell MM,
    3. Ditt H,
    4. Panknin C, et al

    . Cervical CT angiography comparing routine noncontrast and a late venous scan as masks for automated bone subtraction: feasibility study and examination of the influence of patient motion on image quality. Invest Radiol 2008;43:27–32 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31815597ac pmid:18097274

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Gratama van Andel HA,
    3. Venema HW,
    4. Streekstra GJ, et al

    . Removal of bone in CT angiography by multiscale matched mask bone elimination. Med Phys 2007;34:3711–23 doi:10.1118/1.2767931 pmid:17985616

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Pozzi-Mucelli F,
    3. Bruni S,
    4. Doddi M, et al

    . Detection of intracranial aneurysms with 64 channel multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Radiol 2007;64:15–26 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.018 pmid:17412544

    CrossRefPubMed