Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticlePEDIATRICS

Demonstration of Normal and Abnormal Fetal Brains Using 3D Printing from In Utero MR Imaging Data

D. Jarvis, P.D. Griffiths and C. Majewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2016, 37 (9) 1757-1761; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4783
D. Jarvis
aFrom the Academic Unit of Radiology (D.J., P.D.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Jarvis
P.D. Griffiths
aFrom the Academic Unit of Radiology (D.J., P.D.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.D. Griffiths
C. Majewski
bCentre for Advanced Additive Manufacturing (C.M.), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Majewski
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: 3D printing is a new manufacturing technology that produces high-fidelity models of complex structures from 3D computer-aided design data. Radiology has been particularly quick to embrace the new technology because of the wide access to 3D datasets. Models have been used extensively to assist orthopedic, neurosurgical, and maxillofacial surgical planning. In this report, we describe methods used for 3D printing of the fetal brain by using data from in utero MR imaging.

The data used to produce the 3D printed fetal brain models were acquired by using a 3D in utero MR imaging volume acquisition. This was achieved by imaging the fetal brain by using an ultrafast, fully balanced steady-state sequence on a 1.5T whole-body MR imaging scanner as detailed in the Table.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Imaging sequence parameters for the 3D FIESTA acquisition

3D volume imaging has an inherently higher signal-to-noise ratio compared with 2D imaging because the whole-brain volume is excited at each repetition rather than section. In addition, the homogeneous excitation across the imaging volume results in more uniform section profiles compared with 2D imaging because partial saturation of signal between sections does not occur. These characteristics enable a smaller partition thickness and FOV to improve anatomic resolution, and the contiguous thin partitions permit postprocessing reconstruction for visualization of the anatomy in different planes. The contrast mechanism of steady-state imaging and flip angle determines the signal intensity from fluids, providing good tissue contrast between the fluid and brain interfaces, which assists in the creation of surface projections. We currently use a flip angle of 60°–70° because higher flip angles are associated with greater aliasing artifacts.1 Scan time is kept short by optimizing the bandwidth (to permit shorter TRs and TEs) and by partial Fourier techniques. These features allow acquisition during maternal suspended respiration leading to reduced movement artifacts.

Postacquisition Image Processing

The images from the 3D dataset are transferred onto a desktop PC and loaded into a free open-source software package, 3D Slicer (http://www.slicer.org), for segmentation.2 Once loaded into 3D Slicer, the brightness and contrast are user-selected to optimize visualization of the CSF/brain interfaces (both external and ventricular). Each brain is manually segmented on a section-by-section basis in the plane used for acquisition (usually axial), with other anatomic planes and fetal brain atlases used for cross-reference to improve accuracy.3,4 Manual outlining of the fetal brain anatomy takes approximately 50–60 minutes for second-trimester brains and 90–120 minutes for more mature fetuses; the longer time is due to the increased complexity of sulcation/gyration.

3D Slicer identifies anatomic areas by using labels, each represented by an index value and associated color. Once all the ROIs have been annotated, the software reconstructs electronic 3D surface models of the fetal brain by using the resultant labels. The surface model data are then saved in the correct file format (STereoLithography or .stl) required for 3D printing. The STereoLithography file cannot be edited, and the resultant 3D printed model is an exact representation of the generated 3D surface model; therefore, the latter should be examined for any extraneous parts to ensure that the contours are in keeping with anatomic detail. Laplacian smoothing can be applied at the model-building stage to smooth contours if necessary.

3D Printing Technique

“3D printing” is the collective term for a number of technologies that create parts in a layer-by-layer manner directly from 3D computer-aided design data without the need for tooling. The major benefits of 3D printing stem from the ability to produce complex geometries efficiently and effectively. Most 3D printing systems use data in the STereoLithography format, whereby the 3D object is reproduced as a triangulated surface.

The laser sintering process was chosen for models of the fetal brain described in this article. This is a powder bed fusion process, whereby a layer of powder is deposited and selectively scanned by a CO2 laser. Areas scanned by the laser melt and, on re-solidification, form the layers of the part. Laser sintering can produce parts from a range of materials, including metals and ceramics. In our examples, polymer material Nylon-12 (http://www.eos.info/material-p) was used to construct the models of the fetal brain. Specifically, the models were produced by using PA 2200 material on a Formiga P100 laser sintering system (EOS, Munich, Germany).

While high strength is not a key requirement for production of most models, they must be strong enough to endure handling by potentially large numbers of users. Parts produced via laser sintering generally have relatively high mechanical strength compared with other 3D printing processes, again making this a suitable process. While it is possible to build the model in 2 separate materials, most 3D printing processes only allow the production of parts in a single color. However, a number of processes allow the production of multiple colors and/or materials within a single part as demonstrated later.

Additionally, the lack of a requirement for tooling allows the production of small volumes (including production of single units) at no cost penalty. This can provide major advantages in personalization for medical use, whereby every individual may have different geometric or functional needs from a similar part. The ability to produce one-off models economically makes 3D printing highly suitable for the production of training models and demonstrators as discussed in this article. More comprehensive discussions of methods for and applications of 3D printing within the medical sector can be found elsewhere.5,6

Application of 3D Models of the Fetal Brain

One of the major applications we envisage for this technology is trying to improve anatomic understanding and training of radiologists to develop their skills in fetal neuroimaging. We have created a fetal brain teaching file available for review, which consists of a number of cases with sample reports and background of the condition, with images from both the 2D studies and 3D printed models produced via laser sintering. The abnormal brain models consist of several of the more common brain malformations at various gestational ages along with age-matched controls (Figs 1 and 2). It is also possible to transpose 2D images from in utero MR imaging studies onto 3D models to enhance the understanding of fetal anatomy further. The 3D volume images can be manipulated into the same plane as the 2D images, and those images are copied onto clear plastic with adhesive on 1 side to produce “transfers.” The STereoLithography file of the matched sections from the 3D printed model can be exported to produce a limited print of the model to produce discrete 3D printed sections of the fetal brain as shown in Fig 3. A further possibility is the production of models from multiple materials. For example in the case of the fetal brain models, it can be useful for showing clear differentiation of the ventricular system compared with the remainder of the brain parenchyma as shown in Fig 4. This is a 2-color part produced on an Objet Connex 500 Multi-Material 3D Printing system (https://www.mcad.com/3d-printing/objet-connex-printers/connex-500/).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Images of the 3D printed model produced via laser sintering from an in utero MR imaging study performed at 30 weeks' gestational age in a fetus with ventriculomegaly and an interhemispheric cyst recognized on ultrasonography, compared with an age-matched fetus with no brain abnormality. A 2D single-shot fast spin-echo image in the axial plane of the normal brain is shown (A), along with superior (B) and left lateral (C) views of the 3D printed model. D–F, The matching images from the fetus with agenesis of the corpus callosum and extra-axial cysts, which do not communicate with the ventricular system (type II cysts of Barkovich et al),7 are shown. Note that the orientation of the 2D image has been altered to match the 3D model for ease of interpretation. The left hemisphere contains widespread heterotopia, a feature that was confirmed at postmortem examination.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Images of the 3D printed models produced via laser sintering from 2 in utero MR imaging studies performed at 2 gestational ages in a fetus with lissencephaly compared with an age-matched fetus with no brain abnormality. A 2D single-shot fast spin-echo image in the axial plane of the normal brain at 22 weeks' gestation is shown (A), along with superior (B) and left lateral (C) views of the 3D printed model. The same format is shown for a healthy 30-week fetus (D–F) and the fetus with lissencephaly (G–L).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A 3D printed model produced via laser sintering with the internal anatomy of the brain shown from an attached 2D single-shot fast spin-echo image to produce a section of the fetal brain—superior (A) and oblique (B) projections.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Dual-material 3D printed brain produced on an Objet Connex 500 jetting system (manufactured courtesy of Professor Richard Bibb, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough, UK). Separate STereoLithography files were exported from 3D Slicer, one consisting of the segmented entire ventricular system and the other of part of the brain parenchyma. The ventricular system is printed in the same white material as the other brains, while the parenchyma is printed in a clear material. The superior (A), inferior (B), and left lateral (C) views show the relationship between the ventricles and brain to advantage.

In summary, we have outlined a method that can be used to produce 3D printed models and have described our approach to constructing 3D models of the fetal brain. The field is developing rapidly and presents a wide range of therapeutic and teaching opportunities for medicine and radiology in particular.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Paul D. Griffiths—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: research agreements with GE Healthcare* and Philips MS.* *Money paid to the institution.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wu ML,
    2. Ko CW,
    3. Chen TY, et al
    . MR ventriculocisternography by using 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging: technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1170–73 pmid:15891179
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fedorov A,
    2. Beichel R,
    3. Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al
    . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1323–41 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 pmid:22770690
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Griffiths PD,
    2. Morris J,
    3. Larroche JC, et al
    . Atlas of Fetal and Postnatal Brain MR. Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier; 2010
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bayer SA,
    2. Altman J
    . The Human Brain during the Third Trimester. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2004
  5. 5.↵
    1. Eggbeer D,
    2. Bibb R,
    3. Paterson AM
    . Medical Modelling: The Application of Advanced Design and Rapid Prototyping Techniques in Medicine: Second Edition. Cambridge: Elsevier Imprint: Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials; 2015
  6. 6.↵
    1. Matsumoto JS,
    2. Morris JM,
    3. Foley TA, et al
    . Three-dimensional physical modeling: applications and experience at Mayo Clinic. Radiographics 2015;35:1989–2006 doi:10.1148/rg.2015140260 pmid:26562234
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Barkovich AJ,
    2. Simon EM,
    3. Walsh CA
    . Callosal agenesis with cyst: a better understanding and new classification. Neurology 2001;56:220–27 doi:10.1212/WNL.56.2.220 pmid:11160959
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received December 15, 2015.
  • Accepted after revision February 15, 2016.
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 9
1 Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Demonstration of Normal and Abnormal Fetal Brains Using 3D Printing from In Utero MR Imaging Data
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Demonstration of Normal and Abnormal Fetal Brains Using 3D Printing from In Utero MR Imaging Data
D. Jarvis, P.D. Griffiths, C. Majewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016, 37 (9) 1757-1761; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4783

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Demonstration of Normal and Abnormal Fetal Brains Using 3D Printing from In Utero MR Imaging Data
D. Jarvis, P.D. Griffiths, C. Majewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016, 37 (9) 1757-1761; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4783
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Transient Hyperintensity of the Infant Thyroid Gland on T1-Weighted MR Imaging: Correlation with Postnatal Age, Gestational Age, and Signal Intensity of the Pituitary Gland
  • Widening the Neuroimaging Features of Adenosine Deaminase 2 Deficiency
  • Evaluation of DISORDER: Retrospective Image Motion Correction for Volumetric Brain MRI in a Pediatric Setting
Show more PEDIATRICS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire