Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLETTER

Open Globe Injury: Ultrasound First!

A. Lecler, A. Pinel and P. Koskas
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2017, 38 (11) E99-E100; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5282
A. Lecler
aDepartment of Radiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Lecler
A. Pinel
bDepartment of Ophthalmology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Pinel
P. Koskas
cDepartment of Radiology Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Koskas
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We read with much interest the article by Dr. Bodanapally and colleagues1 in the March 2017 issue of AJNR regarding the interest of facial CT findings as prognostic predictors of visual outcome in open globe injury. They reported 4 variables associated with poor outcome on a regression model and showed that a grade III posterior segment hemorrhage had a strong positive predictive value of 100% for profound vision loss. Although these results are interesting and innovative, we believe that the interest in CT as a prognostic tool for visual outcome in open globe injury remains limited.

The exploration of the eyeball is still difficult with CT, even more so in case of injury. That is why the authors chose to refer to posterior eyeball injuries collectively as posterior segment hemorrhage. However, CT is only a mere surrogate for major ocular injuries such as retinal (RD) or choroidal detachments, which are reported to be the most important factors influencing final visual acuity in clinical and surgical studies.2 Although vitreous hemorrhage may predict RD, it is not associated with poor visual outcome on its own. From a clinical and practical viewpoint, an emergency surgery is often performed on patients with open globe injuries to explore the eyeball, state the injuries, and perform a vitrectomy in the case of intravitreous hemorrhage. The demonstration of an RD or choroidal detachment profoundly changes the management of patients because prompt intervention and repair of these injuries significantly improve visual outcomes.2 Thus, distinguishing attenuated vitreous membranes from RD is essential. It is, unfortunately, not directly possible with CT.

Moreover, the quantification of posterior segment hemorrhage is difficult with CT because of heterogeneous and varying blood densities in the eyes depending on the location of the hemorrhage, the presence of RD or choroidal detachment, the presence of a hematoma, or the delay between the injury and the CT. The absence of blood visualization on CT is also not reliable because of a lack of sensitivity.

The most appropriate imaging tool to assess prognostic predictors of visual outcome in open globe injury would be sonography. Its role in the detection of RD in eyes with opaque media has been established clearly in the past. At present, there is no other method to reliably ascertain the anatomic position of the retina when direct examination is impossible. It allows a direct visualization of the main eyeball injuries, such as RD, globe rupture, perforating injury, or endophthalmitis.2 These items are used in the main predictive models that have been developed for clinical decision-making, such as the Ocular Trauma Score,3 which can predict profound vision loss with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91%. Sonography has 100% accuracy in the diagnosis of RD and can distinguish RD from choroidal detachments.2 It is reported to be more accurate than CT in the diagnosis of vitreous hemorrhages,4 to provide an accurate quantification, and to detect even a small amount of blood that is not visible on CT. It may depict hyphema, lens dislocations, and intraocular foreign bodies. It can provide the exact location of the injuries and can differentiate vitreous from subretinal hemorrhage. It can even indicate some rare injuries that are often inoperable, such as closed-funnel RDs.

Sonography is simple to perform and interpret, easily accessible even at the patient's bedside or in a military setting. It is inexpensive and does not expose patients to ionizing radiation, as opposed to CT. It can be associated with a Doppler measurement of the central retinal artery, which reflects the intraocular hemodynamic, and is also a prognostic predictor for visual outcome. Finally, it is easy to perform sequential sonography during follow-up, which is crucial because one-quarter of patients with an open globe injury will develop an RD or a retinal tear after surgical repair.2

In conclusion, although interesting in the context of emergency, especially for the detection of ocular foreign bodies, we believe that CT has limited value in immediate clinical decision-making and as a prognostic predictor of visual outcome, and we believe that sonography could be a valuable and effective tool to predict outcomes.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bodanapally UK,
    2. Addis H,
    3. Dreizin D, et al
    . Prognostic predictors of visual outcome in open globe injury: emphasis on facial CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1013–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5107 pmid:28302613
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Andreoli MT,
    2. Yiu G,
    3. Hart L, et al
    . B-scan ultrasonography following open globe repair. Eye 2014;28:381–85 doi:10.1038/eye.2013.289 pmid:24406404
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kuhn F,
    2. Maisiak R,
    3. Mann L, et al
    . The Ocular Trauma Score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2002;15:163–65, vi doi:10.1016/S0896-1549(02)00007-X pmid:12229231
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bäuerle J,
    2. Gross NJ,
    3. Egger K, et al
    . Terson's Syndrome: diagnostic comparison of ocular sonography and CT. J Neuroimaging 2016;26:247–52 doi:10.1111/jon.12285 pmid:26250688
    CrossRefPubMed
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 11
1 Nov 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Open Globe Injury: Ultrasound First!
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Open Globe Injury: Ultrasound First!
A. Lecler, A. Pinel, P. Koskas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2017, 38 (11) E99-E100; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5282

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Open Globe Injury: Ultrasound First!
A. Lecler, A. Pinel, P. Koskas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2017, 38 (11) E99-E100; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5282
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • REPLY:
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply:
  • Inconsistencies between Radiologic and Cadaveric Studies of the Occipital Sinus
  • Evolution of Radial Access in Neurointerventional Surgery
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire