Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Letter

Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Advances in Screening, Imaging, and Management Trends

A. Malhotra, X. Wu and K. Seifert
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2018, 39 (9) E103; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5733
A. Malhotra
aDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Malhotra
X. Wu
aDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Wu
K. Seifert
aDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Seifert
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We would like to commend Nagpal et al1 for their study assessing the advances in screening, imaging, and management trends for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI). However, we would like to point out a few persisting controversies regarding the management of patients with BCVI.

A major contributor to the confusion is the technique used for the diagnosis of BCVI. DSA has historically been the criterion standard. Increasingly, its use has been supplanted by CTA. However, the current role of DSA is not well-defined. Some groups recommend DSA for patients with negative CTA findings and persistent concern for BCVI, while other groups recommend DSA for patients with positive CTA findings. Paulus et al2 justified CTA use despite showing only 68% sensitivity (and 92% specificity) for 64-channel multidetector CTA and recommended DSA for patients with CTA with negative findings with persistent neurologic symptoms. Subsequently, high false-positive rates of up to 47.9% have been reported with CTA, with the authors strongly recommending the use of DSA in all patients with positive findings on CTA with suspected BCVI to avoid unnecessary anticoagulation.3 A possible explanation for the high false-positive rates is that the radiologists were overcalling vascular injury because of initial studies showing low sensitivity, bringing into question the need for a radiology review process. Unfortunately, most of these studies did not review the reasons for the reported low sensitivity or high false-positivity. Previous studies have also shown a learning curve with intervention, which resulted in the improved sensitivity of CTA without an increase in false-positives. Greater awareness of BCVI, the grading of injury, and imaging pitfalls would help improve noninvasive imaging diagnosis.

The justification for DSA after positive CTA findings is to avoid anticoagulation in false-positive reads. However, the same groups that showed a high false-positive rate with CTA also showed the relative safety of antithrombotic therapy, even in patients with traumatic brain injury and solid organ injury.4

Ultimately, it is the incidence and, hopefully, the prevention of subsequent stroke that would determine the utility of imaging. The true incidence of stroke in patients with BCVI is not well-understood. This is partly because detection of BCVI is imperfect, and most studies on BCVI report only the hospital course of these patients and not long-term outcomes. Studies that do report postdischarge outcomes have reported that up to 75% of strokes in BCVI may occur before the diagnosis is made on imaging.5 This finding is important to recognize while discussing the role of imaging. For example, it would be interesting to know whether the patients with negative DSA findings and positive CTA findings have any strokes subsequently.

Optimized, selective CTA in high-risk populations may be the most cost-effective strategy for BCVI detection.6,7

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Nagpal P,
    2. Policeni BA,
    3. Bathla G, et al
    . Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: advances in screening, imaging, and management trends. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017 Oct 12. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5412 pmid:29025722
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Paulus EM,
    2. Fabian TC,
    3. Savage SA, et al
    . Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography: more slices finally cut it. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:279–83; discussion 284–85 doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000101 pmid:24458034
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Shahan CP,
    2. Magnotti LJ,
    3. Stickley SM, et al
    . A safe and effective management strategy for blunt cerebrovascular injury: avoiding unnecessary anticoagulation and eliminating stroke. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;80:915–22 doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001041 pmid:27015579
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shahan CP,
    2. Magnotti LJ,
    3. McBeth PB, et al
    . Early antithrombotic therapy is safe and effective in patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury and solid organ injury or traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;81:173–77 doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001058 pmid:27027559
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. DiCocco JM,
    2. Fabian TC,
    3. Emmett KP, et al
    . Functional outcomes following blunt cerebrovascular injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:955–60 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318287800f pmid:23511131
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Malhotra A,
    2. Wu X,
    3. Kalra VB, et al
    . Screening for pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: review of literature and a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:1751–57 doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.05.005 pmid:26546389
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Malhotra A,
    2. Wu X,
    3. Kalra VB, et al
    . Evaluation for blunt cerebrovascular injury: review of the literature and a cost-effectiveness analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:330–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4515 pmid:26450540
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • © 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 39 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 39, Issue 9
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Advances in Screening, Imaging, and Management Trends
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Advances in Screening, Imaging, and Management Trends
A. Malhotra, X. Wu, K. Seifert
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2018, 39 (9) E103; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5733

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Advances in Screening, Imaging, and Management Trends
A. Malhotra, X. Wu, K. Seifert
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2018, 39 (9) E103; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5733
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Reply:
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire