Fast Stent Retrieval during Mechanical Thrombectomy Improves Recanalization in Patients with the Negative Susceptibility Vessel Sign

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Liebeskind DS,
   2. Sanossian N,
   3. Yong WH, et al

   . CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke. Stroke 2011;42:1237–43 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605576 pmid:21393591

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Kim SK,
   2. Yoon W,
   3. Kim TS, et al

   . Histologic analysis of retrieved clots in acute ischemic stroke: correlation with stroke etiology and gradient-echo MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1756–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4402 pmid:26159515

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Molina CA

   . Imaging the clot: does clot appearance predict the efficacy of thrombolysis? Stroke 2005;36:2333–34 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000185933.44619.1b pmid:16224076

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Gunning GM,
   2. McArdle K,
   3. Mirza M, et al

   . Clot friction variation with fibrin content; implications for resistance to thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:34–38 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012721 pmid:28044009

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Machi P,
   2. Jourdan F,
   3. Ambard D, et al

   . Experimental evaluation of stent retrievers’ mechanical properties and effectiveness. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:257–63 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012213 pmid:27016318

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Yuki I,
   2. Kan I,
   3. Vinters HV, et al

   . The impact of thromboemboli histology on the performance of a mechanical thrombectomy device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:643–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2842 pmid:22207297

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Yoo AJ,
   2. Andersson T

   . Thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: challenges to procedural success. J Stroke 2017;19:121–30 doi:10.5853/jos.2017.00752 pmid:28592779

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Goyal M,
   2. Menon BK,
   3. van Zwam WH, et al

   ; HERMES Collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X pmid:26898852

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Kaesmacher J,
   2. Gralla J,
   3. Mosimann PJ, et al

   . Reasons for reperfusion failures in stent-retriever-based thrombectomy: registry analysis and proposal of a classification system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1848–53 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5759 pmid:30166434

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Soize S,
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Mirza M, et al

    . Fast stent retrieval improves recanalization rates of thrombectomy: experimental study on different thrombi. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1049–53 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6559 pmid:32409312

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Massari F,
    2. Henninger N,
    3. Lozano JD, et al

    . ARTS (Aspiration-Retriever Technique for Stroke): initial clinical experience. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:325–32 doi:10.1177/1591019916632369 pmid:26908591

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Mizokami T,
    2. Uwatoko T,
    3. Matsumoto K, et al

    . Aspiration Catheter Reach to Thrombus (ART) sign in combined technique for mechanical thrombectomy: impact for first-pass complete reperfusion. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;28:104301 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.07.017 pmid:31375403

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Liu ZS,
    2. Zhou LJ,
    3. Sun Y, et al

    . Thrombectomy using “clamping embolus with semi-retrieval” technique in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;27:733–39 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.013 pmid:29153304

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Vandenbroucke JP,
    2. von Elm E,
    3. Altman DG, et al

    ; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:W163–94 doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1 pmid:17938389

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Kaste M,
    3. Fieschi C, et al

    . Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA 1995;274:1017–25 doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530130023023 pmid:7563451

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Adams HP Jr.,
    2. Bendixen BH,
    3. Kappelle LJ, et al

    . Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial—TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993;24:35–41 doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35 pmid:7678184

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Bracard S,
    3. Guillemin S

    , HERMES Collaborators, et al. eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:433–38 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127 pmid:30194109

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Bourcier R,
    2. Ben Hassen W,
    3. Soize S, et al

    ; ASTER and the THRACE Investigators. Susceptibility vessel sign on MRI predicts better clinical outcome in patients with anterior circulation acute stroke treated with stent retriever as first-line strategy. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:328–33 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014217 pmid:30154254

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Darcourt J,
    2. Withayasuk P,
    3. Vukasinovic I, et al

    . Predictive value of susceptibility vessel sign for arterial recanalization and clinical improvement in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2019;50:512–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022912 pmid:30602358

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Kim SK,
    2. Yoon W,
    3. Heo TW, et al

    . Negative susceptibility vessel sign and underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1266–71 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4280 pmid:25814657

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Bourcier R,
    2. Duchmann Z,
    3. Sgreccia A, et al

    . Diagnostic performances of the susceptibility vessel sign on MRI for the prediction of macroscopic thrombi features in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Di 2020;29:105245 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105245 pmid:33066935

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Castonguay AC,
    3. Linfante I, et al

    . First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices. Stroke 2018;49:660–66 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020315 pmid:29459390

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Balami JS,
    2. White PM,
    3. McMeekin PJ, et al

    . Complications of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: prevention and management. Int J Stroke 2018;13:348–61 doi:10.1177/1747493017743051 pmid:29171362

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Ospel JM,
    2. Volny O,
    3. Jayaraman M, et al

    . Optimizing fast first pass complete reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke: the BADDASS approach (BAlloon guiDe with large bore Distal Access catheter with dual aspiration with Stent-retriever as Standard approach). Expert Rev Med Devices 2019;16:955–63 doi:10.1080/17434440.2019.1684263 pmid:31648562

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Starke RM,
    3. Murad MH, et al

    . Impact of balloon guide catheter on technical and clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:335–39 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013179 pmid:28754806

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Duffy S,
    2. McCarthy R,
    3. Farrell M. T

    , et al. Per-pass analysis of thrombus composition in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Stroke 2019;50:1156–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023419 pmid:31009342

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Bourcier R,
    2. Desilles JP,
    3. Consoli A

    . Letter by Bourcier et al regarding article, “Per-Pass Analysis of Thrombus Composition in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy.” Stroke 2019;50:e295 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026485 pmid:31514694

    CrossRefPubMed