Predictors of the Effects of Flow Diversion in Very Large and Giant Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Nakase H,
   3. Shin Y,
   4. Kanemoto Y, et al

   . Long-term outcome of unruptured giant cerebral aneurysms. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46:379–86 doi:10.2176/nmc.46.379 pmid:16936458

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Pia HW,
   3. Zierski J

   . Giant cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev 1982;5:117–48 doi:10.1007/BF01742676 pmid:6762507

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Lemole GM,
   3. Henn J,
   4. Spetzler RF, et al

   . Surgical management of giant aneurysms. Operative Techniques in Neurosurgery 2000;3:239–54 doi:10.1053/otns.2000.20464

   CrossRef
4. 4.↵
   2. Laasko A,
   3. Hernesniemi C,
   4. Yonekawa Y, et al.

   2. Sano H

   . Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms of anterior circulation using multiple clips. In: Laasko A, Hernesniemi C, Yonekawa Y, et al., eds. Surgical Management of Cerebrovascular Disease: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum. SpringerWien; 2010; 27–31
5. 5.↵
   2. Molyneux A,
   3. Kerr R,
   4. Stratton I, et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;11:304–14 doi:10.1053/jscd.2002.130390 pmid:17903891

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Henkes H,
   3. Fischer S,
   4. Weber W, et al

   . Endovascular coil occlusion of 1811 intracranial aneurysms: early angiographic and clinical results. Neurosurgery 2004;54:268–80; discussion 280–85 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000103221.16671.f0 pmid:14744273

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Jahromi BS,
   3. Mocco J,
   4. Bang JA, et al

   . Clinical and angiographic outcome after endovascular management of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;63:662–74; discussion 674–75 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000325497.79690.4C pmid:18981877

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Murayama Y,
   3. Viñuela F,
   4. Ishii A, et al

   . Initial clinical experience with Matrix detachable coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2006;105:192–99 doi:10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.192 pmid:17219822

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. O'Kelly CJ,
    3. Krings T,
    4. Fiorella D, et al

    . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Potts MB, et al

    . Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial. Neurosurgery 2017;80:40–48 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 pmid:28362885

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Bender MT,
    3. Colby GP,
    4. Lin LM, et al

    . Predictors of cerebral aneurysm persistence and occlusion after flow diversion: a single-institution series of 445 cases with angiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg 2018;130:259–67 doi:10.3171/2017.11.JNS171738 pmid:29600915

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Makoyeva A,
    3. Bing F,
    4. Darsaut TE, et al

    . The varying porosity of braided self-expanding stents and flow diverters: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:596–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3234 pmid:22878007

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Song J,
    3. Shin YS

    . Antiplatelet drug resistance did not increase the thromboembolic events after stent-assisted coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a single center experience of 99 cases. Neurol Sci 2017;38:879–85 doi:10.1007/s10072-017-2859-z pmid:28233076

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S,
    4. Gonzalez LF, et al

    . Coiling of large and giant aneurysms: complications and long-term results of 334 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:546–52 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3696 pmid:23945229

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Sluzewski M,
    3. Menovsky T,
    4. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:257–62 pmid:12591644

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Peschillo S,
    3. Caporlingua A,
    4. Resta MC, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of large and giant carotid aneurysms with flow-diverter stents alone or in combination with coils: a multicenter experience and long-term follow-up. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017;13:492–502 doi:10.1093/ons/opx032 pmid:28838114

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Oishi H,
    3. Teranishi K,
    4. Yatomi K, et al

    . Flow diverter therapy using a Pipeline Embolization Device for 100 unruptured large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysms in a single center in a Japanese population. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2018;58:461–67 doi:10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0148 pmid:30298832

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Larrabide I,
    3. Aguilar ML,
    4. Morales HG, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow changes induced by flow diverters: relation to aneurysm size and shape. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:816–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3288 pmid:23019173

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Saatci I,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. Ozer C, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Appanaboyina S, et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67 doi:10.1109/tmi.2005.844159 pmid:15822804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Choi JH,
    3. Lee KS,
    4. Kim B, et al

    . Treatment outcomes of large and giant intracranial aneurysms according to various treatment modalities. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020;162:2745–52 doi:10.1007/s00701-020-04540-1 pmid:32827268

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Dai D,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Kadirvel R, et al

    . Patency of branches after coverage with multiple telescoping flow-diverter devices: an in vivo study in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:171–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2879 pmid:22158925

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Kojima M,
    3. Irie K,
    4. Fukuda T, et al

    . The study of flow diversion effects on aneurysm using multiple Enterprise stents and two flow diverters. Asian J Neurosurg 2012;7:159–65 doi:10.4103/1793-5482.106643 pmid:23559981

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Siddiqui AH,
    3. Kan P,
    4. Abla AA, et al

    . Complications after treatment with Pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery 2012;71:E509–13; discussion E513 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318258e1f8 pmid:22710418

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Kim BM,
    3. Shin YS,
    4. Baik MW, et al

    . Pipeline Embolization Device for large/giant or fusiform aneurysms: an initial multi-center experience in Korea. Neurointervention 2016;11:10–17 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.1.10 pmid:26958407

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Cohen JE,
    3. Gomori JM,
    4. Moscovici S, et al

    . Delayed complications after flow-diverter stenting: reactive in-stent stenosis and creeping stents. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1116–22 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.010 pmid:24524952

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Guédon A,
    3. Clarençon F,
    4. Maria FD, et al

    . Very late ischemic complications in flow-diverter stents: a retrospective analysis of a single-center series. J Neurosurg 2016;125:929–35 doi:10.3171/2015.10.JNS15703 pmid:26824382

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M,
    4. Scrivano E, et al

    . Association between hemodynamic conditions and occlusion times after flow diversion in cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:286–90 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011080 pmid:24696500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Augsburger L,
    4. Reymond P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1827–34 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1482-2 pmid:22926629

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Taschner CA,
    3. Chapot R,
    4. Costalat V, et al

    . GREAT: a randomized controlled trial comparing HydroSoft/HydroFrame and bare platinum coils for endovascular aneurysm treatment: procedural safety and core-lab-assessed angiographic results. Neuroradiology 2016;58:777–86 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1693-y pmid:27137926

    CrossRefPubMed