Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

More articles from Practice Perspectives

  • Practice Perspectives
    You have access
    Qualifying Certainty in Radiology Reports through Deep Learning–Based Natural Language Processing
    F. Liu, P. Zhou, S.J. Baccei, M.J. Masciocchi, N. Amornsiripanitch, C.I. Kiefe and M.P. Rosen
    American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2021, 42 (10) 1755-1761; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7241
  • FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBPractice Perspectives
    You have access
    Am I Ready to Be an Independent Neuroradiologist? Objective Trends in Neuroradiology Fellows' Performance during the Fellowship Year
    J.H. Masur, J.E. Schmitt, D. Lalevic, T.S. Cook, L.J. Bagley, S. Mohan and A.P. Nayate
    American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2021, 42 (5) 815-823; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7030

    Progress through fellowship correlates with a decline in report turnaround times and discrepancy rates for cross-sectional neuroimaging call studies and slight improvement in indirect quantitative measurement of report clarity.

  • Practice Perspectives
    Open Access
    Displaying Multiphase CT Angiography Using a Time-Variant Color Map: Practical Considerations and Potential Applications in Patients with Acute Stroke
    J.M. Ospel, O. Volny, W. Qiu, M. Najm, N. Kashani, M. Goyal and B.K. Menon
    American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 200-205; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6376
  • FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBPractice Perspectives
    You have access
    A Call to Improve the Visibility and Access of the American College of Radiology Practice Parameters in Neuroradiology: A Powerful Value Stream Enhancer for Both Neuroradiologists and Patients
    J.E. Jordan and A. Norbash
    American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2019, 40 (2) 213-216; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5923

    The authors suggest that practitioners gain a high degree of familiarity with accessing practice parameters. Doing so will provide additional reference and access to the practice parameters when medical literature searches are undertaken or when questions arise regarding best practices. Such an approach will ensure that future neuroradiology clinical guidelines or technical standards documents are provided as broad an exposure as possible. This effort could enhance the visibility and accessibility of the quality of practice for neuroradiologists, provide needed clinical guidance to practice state-of-the-art neuroradiology/radiology, and ensure the visibility of our valuable contributions to both individual patient care and collective patient outcomes.

  • Practice Perspectives
    You have access
    Bias in Neuroradiology Peer Review: Impact of a “Ding” on “Dinging” Others
    P. Charkhchi, B. Wang, B. Caffo and D.M. Yousem
    American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2019, 40 (1) 19-24; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5908
  • Practice Perspectives
    You have access
    The ASNR-ACR-RSNA Common Data Elements Project: What Will It Do for the House of Neuroradiology?
    A.E. Flanders and J.E. Jordan
    American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2019, 40 (1) 14-18; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5780
  • Practice Perspectives
    You have access
    Mesial Temporal Sclerosis: Accuracy of NeuroQuant versus Neuroradiologist
    M. Azab, M. Carone, S.H. Ying and D.M. Yousem
    American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2015, 36 (8) 1400-1406; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4313
  • Practice Perspectives
    You have access
    Critique of the Analysis of UpToDate.com on the Treatment of Painful Vertebral Compression Fractures: Time to Update UpToDate
    D.P. Beall, W.P. McRoberts, S.H. Berven, J.T. Ledlie, S.M. Tutton and B.P. Parsons
    American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2015, 36 (4) 631-636; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4095
  • FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBPractice Perspectives
    You have access
    Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Outpatient Head CT Scans in an Academic Neuroradiology Practice
    G. Guérin, S. Jamali, C.A. Soto, F. Guilbert and J. Raymond
    American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2015, 36 (1) 24-29; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4058

    Repeatability of outpatient head CT interpretations performed in an academic practice was assessed in 119 randomly selected studies. These were blindly read twice by 8 neuroradiologists. Differences in location and severity of findings occurred in 9.2% of cases and contradictory findings in 15.1%. Thus, discrepancies in double-blind interpretations were more common than reported in peer-review quality assurance programs.

  • EDITOR'S CHOICEPractice Perspectives
    You have access
    Physician Self-Referral and Imaging Use Appropriateness: Negative Cervical Spine MRI Frequency as an Assessment Metric
    T.J. Amrhein, B.E. Paxton, M.P. Lungren, N.T. Befera, H.R. Collins, C. Yurko, J.D. Eastwood and R.K. Kilani
    American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2014, 35 (12) 2248-2253; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4076

    Five hundred cervical spine MRI studies,half ordered by referring physicians who owned scanners and received technical fees and half by physicians who did not, were reviewed for percentage of negative results and number of concomitant shoulder MRIs performed. There were 17.3% more negative scans in the financial-interest group. Patients in this group were also more likely to undergo shoulder MRI.

Pages

  • Next
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire