Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticlePEDIATRICS
Open Access

Design of 3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Children is Enabled by Radiologic Imaging

Z. Starosolski, P. Admane, J. Dunn, B. Kaziny, T.A.G.M. Huisman and A. Annapragada
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6794
Z. Starosolski
aEdward B. Singleton Department of Radiology (Z.S., T.A.G.M.H., A.A.), Texas Children’s Hospital, Feigin Center, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Z. Starosolski
P. Admane
bDepartment of Radiology (P.A.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Admane
J. Dunn
cDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Virology (J.D.), Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Dunn
B. Kaziny
dDepartment of Pediatrics (B.K.), Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Kaziny
T.A.G.M. Huisman
aEdward B. Singleton Department of Radiology (Z.S., T.A.G.M.H., A.A.), Texas Children’s Hospital, Feigin Center, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T.A.G.M. Huisman
A. Annapragada
aEdward B. Singleton Department of Radiology (Z.S., T.A.G.M.H., A.A.), Texas Children’s Hospital, Feigin Center, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Annapragada
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: 3D-printed nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 molecular diagnostic testing address the national shortage of swabs. Swab designs for adult use were placed in the public domain in March 2020. Swabs for pediatric use, however, need to be smaller and more flexible to navigate delicate pediatric nasopharyngeal cavities. We describe a novel use of maxillofacial CT scans to aid in the design of pediatric nasopharyngeal swabs.

ABBREVIATIONS:

COVID-19
coronavirus disease 2019
RT-PCR
real-time polymerase chain reaction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a worldwide pandemic and has resulted in shortages of medical supplies, including nasopharyngeal swabs used in diagnostic tests. 3D printing provides a novel solution, and designs for 3D-printed nasopharyngeal swabs are freely distributed via a GitHub repository.1 The effort, however, has focused on swabs for use in adult patients. These adult swabs are too inflexible and too large for safe pediatric use, particularly in children younger than 3 years of age. At our hospital (Texas Children’s Hospital), a large pediatric tertiary-care center, a 3D-printed swab that replicated the dimensions of a commercial pediatric swab (COPAN Flock Technologies; Puritan Diagnostics) was evaluated by one of our pediatric emergency physicians. However, the 3D-printed swab was not sufficiently flexible and would risk damaging the nasal passages of the child. Simply reducing the diameter of the flexible shaft was deemed inadvisable because the use of the swab involves twisting in both directions after insertion and a thinner shaft would risk breakage in situ. We, therefore, set out to design and produce novel 3D-printed swabs for use in infants and young children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved all clinical data use. Examination of maxillofacial CT scans of patients 1–3 years of age suggested that primary deflection of the swab in the sagittal plane would be sufficient to navigate from the external nares to the posterior nasopharynx. We, therefore, designed elliptical cross-section swabs (Fig 1) and verified that sagittal shaft deflection was adequate. We then made 3D prints of the nasopharyngeal passage itself, and physically tested the ability of individual swab prototypes to navigate the passage. We noted that less flexible designs would get trapped in the crenulations of the nasopharyngeal passage and might require multiple attempts to reach the posterior nasopharynx, thus lengthening the time required to reach the sampling location and possibly injuring the delicate pediatric anatomy. On the assumption that increased navigation time and resistance correlated with patient discomfort, we chose the navigation time and a qualitative assessment of resistance as measures of patient discomfort, ultimately selecting the design with the shortest navigation time and the lowest resistance score for clinical use.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

A, Sagittal section of a maxillofacial CT scan of a 22-month-old patient. Shown in red is the trajectory of a virtually inserted swab reaching the posterior nasopharynx. The white box shows the portion of the anatomy chosen to print the nasopharyngeal passage. B, A commercial flocked pediatric swab (COPAN Flock Technologies swab) reaching the posterior nasopharynx within the 3D-printed nasopharyngeal passage. C, Design of the elliptical-section 3D-printed pediatric swab (Design ES).

Maxillofacial CT datasets of 5 patients, 11 to 34 months of age and unremarkable for pathologies involving the maxillofacial region, were randomly selected from our data base. Images were processed in 3D Slicer (Version 4.10; http://www.slicer.org) to create Standard Triangle Language files for printing. Nasopharyngeal passages were printed on a Form2 printer using Elastic Resin (Formlabs). Swab designs were made in Fusion 360 (AUTODESK) and printed on a Form2 printer using Surgical Guide Resin (Formlabs).

We tested 5 swabs designs: 2 commercial mini-swabs, Flocked 1, PURITAN Diagnostics and Flocked 2, COPAN Flock Technologies; and 3 in-house-printed, all of which had a flexible shaft length of approximately 50 mm, a handle of 78 mm, and a transition zone of 14 mm, as shown in Fig 1, and varied in the flexible shaft cross-section: Design E, 1.2 mm × 0.8 mmø; Design I, 1.2 mm; and Design ES, 1.2 mm × 0.8 mmø, with an additional slanted posterior edge of the brush. The Table shows dimensions (in millimeters) for each of the swab types tested. Navigation of each swab from the external nares to the posterior nasopharynx was done by 1 individual, the order of testing of the individual swabs and anatomic models was randomized, and each test was repeated 3 times. The time to complete navigation was timed by an observer using a hand-held stopwatch, while the resistance on insertion was classified using a 3-level resistance score (1, easy insertion: no resistance; 2, medium: mild resistance; and 3, hard: resistance requiring extra force). All statistical calculations were performed in Matlab R19a (MathWorks).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Tabularized dimensions for 2 commercial and 3 in-house printed swab designsa

The quality of specimen recovery from Design ES nasopharyngeal swabs was determined by performing a crossover collection study with the commercial swabs (Puritan Diagnostics) and prototype NB swabs in 2 healthy adult volunteers, a 26-year-old man and a 28-year-old woman. Both nostrils of the volunteers were sampled by each swab in successive order. The swabs were placed into a MicroTest M4RT viral transport containing 3 mL of media (Remel). Nucleic acid was extracted using 200 uL from each viral transport on the eMAG system (bioMérieux) and eluted into 50 uL of buffer. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed on each eluate using the Centers for Disease Control’s 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Emergency Use Authorization assay,2 which includes 2 targets in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleocapsid region and 1 target in the human RNase P gene to assess the cellular quality of the sample.

RESULTS

Two commercial flocked mini-swabs (from Puritan Diagnostics and COPAN Flock Technologies) and 3 in-house printed swab designs were tested. All in-house swabs were successfully navigated to the posterior nasopharynx in all 5 nasopharyngeal passage models, while 1 commercial swab (COPAN Flock Technologies) was incapable of insertion into anatomic model 1 (Fig 2). On the basis of the shortest navigation time and the lowest resistance score (Fig 2C), Design ES was chosen as the preferred design for clinical testing. Preliminary clinical testing in 2 adult volunteers demonstrated recovery of cellular material from Design ES swabs to be within a concentration of 0.3 log of that from the currently used nasopharyngeal swabs.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Results comparison based on 3 repetitions and 5 anatomic models. A, Average performance score (a lower value of the performance is better). B, Average time of the procedure in seconds. The Flocked 2 swab was not able to complete the testing procedure due to very narrow nasal passages of model 1. The asterisk indicates the significant difference calculated by multiple ANOVA statistical tests. Error bars represents SDs. C, Graph showing the relation of time and performance tests results for each of the tested swabs. Locations closer to the graph origin indicate faster and smoother test performance.

DISCUSSION

Pediatric nasopharyngeal swabs (mini-swabs) are a thinner, smaller, more flexible version of those used for adults and are in even shorter supply during the COVID-19 pandemic than the adult swabs.

3D-printed swabs are fundamentally different from existing commercial swab designs in the form of the swab tip: While commercial swabs have flocked fibrous tips, 3D-printed swabs have solid tips with hemispheric nubs. However, both in vitro and in vivo testing have shown them to be practically identical in sample transfer for viral assay by RT-PCR both in our own labs and in other labs.3,4 Of note, at the time of this writing, the pediatric swabs printed using Design ES have now been used in our hospital in >1000 patients with no reported problems.

This brief report has several limitations. Only 5 nasopharyngeal prints of patients in a limited age range (1–3 years) were used for the testing. A broader range of ages and a larger number of patients would make this study more rigorous. The insertion tests were performed by 1 individual, a technologist with intimate knowledge of the nasopharyngeal anatomy. Testing by a medical professional who would routinely use such swabs in daily practice may change the results. Clinical validation was only performed on 2 adult volunteers and not on a larger number of pediatric subjects. All of these, however, are compromises we made for this emergency development.

Radiology departments have adopted 3D printers recently to provide prints for surgical planning and patient education and are uniquely positioned to produce 3D-printed nasopharyngeal swabs during this pandemic. Additionally, they have unique access to volumetric imaging data to optimize and test swab designs. The methods described in this report demonstrate an effective collaboration between members of clinical and research departments in accelerating development and enabling creative patient-centric solutions.

Footnotes

  • This work was partially funded by a grant from the Soicher Family Foundation to A.A.

  • Disclosures: Zbigniew Starosolski—UNRELATED: Patents (Planned, Pending or Issued): Texas Children’s Hospital, Comments: submitted invention disclosure form to Texas Children’s Hospital for a patent titled “Design of Pediatric 3D Printed Nasopharyngeal Swab on June 16, 2020; Stock/Stock Options: Alzeca Biosciences stock. Prasad Admane—RELATED: Grant: Baylor College of Medicine, Comments: Soicher Family Foundation*; RELATED: Patents (Planned, Pending or Issued): Texas Children’s Hospital, Comments: submitted invention disclosure form to Texas Children’s Hospital for a patent titled “Design of Pediatric 3D Printed Nasopharyngeal Swab" on June 16, 2020. Ananth Annapragada—RELATED: Grant: Soicher Family Foundation, Comments: to support work on bioprinting*; UNRELATED: Board Membership: Alzeca Biosciences; Consultancy: Alzeca Biosciences; Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health, Comments: I have several grants pending at National Institutes of Health*; Patents (Planned, Pending or Issued): numerous US and foreign patent applications, Comments: The full list can be obtained at https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/advancedSearch.jsf using search terms: IN: Ananth AND IN: Annapragada*; Royalties: University of Texas, Comments: royalties on patents licensed by the University of Texas to third parties; Stock/Stock Options: Sensulin, Alzeca Biosciences, Comments: I am a significant stockholder in Sensulin and Alzeca Biosciences; Other: Abbott Laboratories, Comments: I am a significant stockholder. *Money paid to the institution.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    Covidswab. http://github.com/rarnaout/Covideswab. Accessed April 1, 2020
  2. 2.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR. U.S. Food and Drug Administration emergency use authorization instructions for use. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download. Accessed July 17, 2020
  3. 3.↵
    1. Corman VM,
    2. Landt O,
    3. Kaiser M, et al
    . Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 2020;25:2000045 doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045 pmid:31992387
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mullis KB,
    2. Faloona FA
    . Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol 1987;155:335–50 doi:10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6 pmid:3431465
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 6, 2020.
  • Accepted after revision July 22, 2020.
  • © 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Design of 3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Children is Enabled by Radiologic Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Design of 3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Children is Enabled by Radiologic Imaging
Z. Starosolski, P. Admane, J. Dunn, B. Kaziny, T.A.G.M. Huisman, A. Annapragada
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2020, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6794

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Design of 3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Children is Enabled by Radiologic Imaging
Z. Starosolski, P. Admane, J. Dunn, B. Kaziny, T.A.G.M. Huisman, A. Annapragada
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2020, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6794
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Transient Hyperintensity of the Infant Thyroid Gland on T1-Weighted MR Imaging: Correlation with Postnatal Age, Gestational Age, and Signal Intensity of the Pituitary Gland
  • Widening the Neuroimaging Features of Adenosine Deaminase 2 Deficiency
  • Evaluation of DISORDER: Retrospective Image Motion Correction for Volumetric Brain MRI in a Pediatric Setting
Show more PEDIATRICS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire