PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - R.E. Gur AU - D. Kaltman AU - E.R. Melhem AU - K. Ruparel AU - K. Prabhakaran AU - M. Riley AU - E. Yodh AU - H. Hakonarson AU - T. Satterthwaite AU - R.C. Gur TI - Incidental Findings in Youths Volunteering for Brain MRI Research AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A3525 DP - 2013 Oct 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 2021--2025 VI - 34 IP - 10 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/34/10/2021.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/34/10/2021.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2013 Oct 01; 34 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRIs are obtained in research in healthy and clinical populations, and incidental findings have been reported. Most studies have examined adults with variability in parameters of image acquisition and clinical measures available. We conducted a prospective study of youths and documented the frequency and concomitants of incidental findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Youths (n = 1400) with an age range from 8–23 years were imaged on the same 3T scanner, with a standard acquisition protocol providing 1.0 mm3 isotropic resolution of anatomic scans. All scans were reviewed by an experienced board-certified neuroradiologist and were categorized into 3 groups: 1) normal: no incidental findings; 2) coincidental: incidental finding(s) were noted, further reviewed with an experienced pediatric neuroradiologist, but were of no clinical significance; 3) incidental findings that on further review were considered to have potential clinical significance and participants were referred for appropriate clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 148 incidental findings (10.6% of sample) were noted, and of these, 12 required clinical follow-up. Incidental findings were not related to age. However, whites had a higher incidence of pineal cysts, and males had a higher incidence of cavum septum pellucidum, which was associated with psychosis-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings, moderated by race and sex, occur in approximately one-tenth of participants volunteering for pediatric research, with few requiring follow-up. The incidence supports a 2-tiered approach of neuroradiologic reading and clinical input to determine the potential significance of incidental findings detected on research MR imaging scans.