PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - D.R. Hansberry AU - N. Agarwal AU - S.F. Gonzales AU - S.R. Baker TI - Are We Effectively Informing Patients? A Quantitative Analysis of On-Line Patient Education Resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A3854 DP - 2014 Jul 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 1270--1275 VI - 35 IP - 7 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/35/7/1270.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/35/7/1270.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2014 Jul 01; 35 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ubiquitous use of the Internet by the public in an attempt to better understand their health care requires the on-line resources written at an appropriate level to maximize comprehension for the average user. The National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association recommend on-line patient education resources written at a third-to-seventh grade level. We evaluated the readability of the patient education resources provided on the Web site of the American Society of Neuroradiology (http://www.asnr.org/patientinfo/). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patient education material from the ASNR Web site and the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery Web site were downloaded and evaluated with the computer software, Readability Studio Professional Edition, by using 10 quantitative readability scales: the Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Coleman-Liau Index, Gunning Fog Index, New Dale-Chall, FORCAST Formula, Fry Graph, Raygor Reading Estimate, and New Fog Count. An unpaired t test was used to compare the readability level of resources available on the American Society of Neuroradiology and the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery Web sites. RESULTS: The 20 individual patient education articles were written at a 13.9 ± 1.4 grade level with only 5% written at <11th grade level. There was no statistical difference between the level of readability of the resources on the American Society of Neuroradiology and Society of Neurointerventional Surgery Web sites. CONCLUSIONS: The patient education resources on these Web sites fail to meet the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association. Members of the public may fail to fully understand these resources and would benefit from revisions that result in more comprehensible information cast in simpler language. AMAAmerican Medical AssociationASNRAmerican Society of NeuroradiologyCLIColeman-Liau IndexFKGLFlesch-Kincaid Grade LevelFREFlesch Reading EaseGFIGunning Fog IndexNDCNew Dale-ChallNFCNew Fog CountRRERaygor Reading EstimateSMOGSimple Measure of GobbledygookSNISSociety of Neurointerventional Surgery