@article {Schneider440, author = {T. Schneider and T.A.G.M. Huisman and J. Fiehler and L.J. Savic and D.M. Yousem}, title = {Differences in Neuroradiology Training Programs around the World}, volume = {36}, number = {3}, pages = {440--444}, year = {2015}, doi = {10.3174/ajnr.A4132}, publisher = {American Journal of Neuroradiology}, abstract = {BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: No previous study compares neuroradiology training programs and teaching schedules across the globe, to our knowledge. This study was conducted to better understand international program requisites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 43 countries were collected by an e-mail-based questionnaire (response rate, 84.0\%). Radiologists across the world were surveyed regarding the neuroradiology training schemes in their institutions. Answers were verified by officers of the national neuroradiology societies. RESULTS: While many countries do not provide fellowship training in neuroradiology (n = 16), others have formal postresidency curricula (n = 27). Many programs have few fellows and didactic sessions, but the 1- or 2-year duration of fellowship training is relatively consistent (n = 23/27, 85\%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variety of fellowship offerings, lessons provided, and ratios of teachers to learners in neuroradiology training programs globally. ACGMEAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical EducationDNRdiagnostic neuroradiologyESNREuropean Society of NeuroradiologyINRinterventional neuroradiologyNRneuroradiology}, issn = {0195-6108}, URL = {https://www.ajnr.org/content/36/3/440}, eprint = {https://www.ajnr.org/content/36/3/440.full.pdf}, journal = {American Journal of Neuroradiology} }