RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Arterial Spin-Labeling Parameters Influence Signal Variability and Estimated Regional Relative Cerebral Blood Flow in Normal Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment: FAIR versus PICORE Techniques
JF American Journal of Neuroradiology
JO Am. J. Neuroradiol.
FD American Society of Neuroradiology
SP 1231
OP 1236
DO 10.3174/ajnr.A4291
VO 36
IS 7
A1 K.-O. Lövblad
A1 M.-L. Montandon
A1 M. Viallon
A1 C. Rodriguez
A1 S. Toma
A1 X. Golay
A1 P. Giannakopoulos
A1 S. Haller
YR 2015
UL http://www.ajnr.org/content/36/7/1231.abstract
AB BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arterial spin-labeling is a noninvasive method to map cerebral blood flow, which might be useful for early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. We directly compared 2 arterial spin-labeling techniques in healthy elderly controls and individuals with mild cognitive impairment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee and included 198 consecutive healthy controls (mean age, 73.65 ± 4.02 years) and 43 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (mean age, 73.38 ± 5.85 years). Two pulsed arterial spin-labeling sequences were performed at 3T: proximal inversion with a control for off-resonance effects (PICORE) and flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery technique (FAIR). Relative cerebral blood flow maps were calculated by using commercial software and standard parameters. Data analysis included spatial normalization of gray matter–corrected relative CBF maps, whole-brain average, and voxelwise comparison of both arterial spin-labeling sequences.RESULTS: Overall, FAIR yielded higher relative CBF values compared with PICORE (controls, 32.7 ± 7.1 versus 30.0 ± 13.1 mL/min/100 g, P = .05; mild cognitive impairment, 29.8 ± 5.4 versus 26.2 ± 8.6 mL/min/100 g, P < .05; all, 32.2 ± 6.8 versus 29.3 ± 12.3 mL/min/100 g, P < .05). FAIR had lower variability (controls, 36.2% versus 68.8%, P < .00001; mild cognitive impairment, 18.9% versus 22.9%, P < .0001; all, 34.4% versus 64.9% P < .00001). The detailed voxelwise analysis revealed a higher signal for FAIR, notably in both convexities, while PICORE had higher signal predominantly in deep cerebral regions.CONCLUSIONS: Overall, FAIR had higher estimated relative CBF and lower interindividual variability than PICORE. In more detail, there were regional differences between both arterial spin-labeling sequences. In summary, these results highlight the need to calibrate arterial spin-labeling sequences.ASLarterial spin-labelingFAIRflow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery techniqueMCImild cognitive impairmentPICOREproximal inversion with a control for off-resonance effectsrCBFrelative cerebral blood flow