PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - A. Morotti AU - J.M. Romero AU - M.J. Jessel AU - H.B. Brouwers AU - R. Gupta AU - K. Schwab AU - A. Vashkevich AU - A. Ayres AU - C.D. Anderson AU - M.E. Gurol AU - A. Viswanathan AU - S.M. Greenberg AU - J. Rosand AU - J.N. Goldstein TI - Effect of CTA Tube Current on Spot Sign Detection and Accuracy for Prediction of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A4810 DP - 2016 Oct 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 1781--1786 VI - 37 IP - 10 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/37/10/1781.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/37/10/1781.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2016 Oct 01; 37 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reduction of CT tube current is an effective strategy to minimize radiation load. However, tube current is also a major determinant of image quality. We investigated the impact of CTA tube current on spot sign detection and diagnostic performance for intracerebral hemorrhage expansion.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected cohort of consecutive patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage from January 2001 to April 2015 who underwent CTA. The study population was divided into 2 groups according to the median CTA tube current level: low current (<350 mA) and high current (≥350 mA). CTA first-pass readings for spot sign presence were independently analyzed by 2 readers. Baseline and follow-up hematoma volumes were assessed by semiautomated computer-assisted volumetric analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of spot sign in predicting hematoma expansion were calculated.RESULTS: This study included 709 patients (288 and 421 in the low- and high-current groups, respectively). A higher proportion of low-current scans identified at least 1 spot sign (20.8% versus 14.7%, P = .034), but hematoma expansion frequency was similar in the 2 groups (18.4% versus 16.2%, P = .434). Sensitivity and positive and negative predictive values were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conversely, high-current scans showed superior specificity (91% versus 84%, P = .015) and overall accuracy (84% versus 77%, P = .038).CONCLUSIONS: CTA obtained at high levels of tube current showed better diagnostic accuracy for prediction of hematoma expansion by using spot sign. These findings may have implications for future studies using the CTA spot sign to predict hematoma expansion for clinical trials.HmAhigh currentICHintracerebral hemorrhageLmAlow current