PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - N. Sanghan AU - T. Chansakul AU - E.D. Kozin AU - A.F. Juliano AU - H.D. Curtin AU - K.L. Reinshagen TI - Retrospective Review of Otic Capsule Contour and Thickness in Patients with Otosclerosis and Individuals with Normal Hearing on CT AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A5892 DP - 2018 Dec 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 2350--2355 VI - 39 IP - 12 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/39/12/2350.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/39/12/2350.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2018 Dec 01; 39 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Otosclerosis is commonly identified on CT as a focus of hypodensity in the otic capsule anterior to the oval window. However, otosclerosis can have a sclerotic phase approximating the density of normal bone, making diagnosis challenging. This study assesses differences in otic capsule contour and thickness anterolateral to the anterior margin of the oval window in patients with otosclerosis compared with individuals with normal hearing.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Axial CT of 104 ears with clinically diagnosed otosclerosis and 108 consecutive ears of audiometrically normal individuals were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists independently evaluated the pattern of otosclerosis, otic capsule contour, and bone thickness on standardized axial images at the level of the oval window and cochleariform process. Measurements were made from the posterolateral margin of the cochlea to the apex of the otic capsule convex contour just anterolateral to the anterior margin of the oval window. In the absence of a convex contour, the sulcus between the oval window and the cochleariform process was identified, and measurement to the depth of the sulcus was used. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the best cutoff value of otic capsule thickness.RESULTS: Mean otic capsule thickness (2 SDs) was 3.08 (0.93) mm and 1.82 (0.31) mm in patients with otosclerosis and individuals with normal hearing, respectively (P < .001), with excellent interobserver agreement. Otic capsule thickness of >2.3 mm had 96.2% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 96.4% negative predictive value for otosclerosis. A bulging/convex contour of the otic capsule had 68.3% sensitivity, 98.1% specificity, 97.3% positive predictive value, and 76.3% negative predictive value.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with otosclerosis have significantly thicker bone abutting the oval window than individuals with normal hearing.CBCTconebeam CTMDCTmultidetector row CT