PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - P. Wangaryattawanich
AU  - B.F. Branstetter
AU  - J.D. Ly
AU  - U. Duvvuri
AU  - D.E. Heron
AU  - T.J. Rath
TI  - Positive Predictive Value of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System Categories 3 and 4 Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
AID  - 10.3174/ajnr.A6589
DP  - 2020 Jun 01
TA  - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG  - 1070--1075
VI  - 41
IP  - 6
4099  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/41/6/1070.short
4100  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/41/6/1070.full
SO  - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2020 Jun 01; 41
AB  - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System is a standardized reporting system intended to risk stratify patients treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to investigate the positive predictive value of the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 3 and 4 on posttreatment PET/CT in patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between 2006 and 2018. Patients whose posttreatment PET/CT scans were interpreted as Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 (suspicious) or 4 (definitive recurrence) at the primary site, regional nodes, or at distant sites were included. The reference standard was histopathology or unequivocal imaging or clinical evidence of treatment failure. The positive predictive values of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 and 4 posttreatment PET/CT were calculated.RESULTS: Seventy-two of 128 patients with posttreatment PET/CT interpreted as Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 at the primary site, regional nodes, or distant sites were proved to have treatment failure at the suspicious sites, yielding an overall positive predictive value of 56% (95% CI, 48%–65%). The positive predictive values of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 by subsite were as follows: primary site, 56% (44/79); regional nodes, 65% (34/52); and distant sites, 79% (42/53). All 69 patients with posttreatment PET/CT interpreted as Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 had true treatment failure, yielding a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 96%–100%): primary site, 100% (28/28); regional nodes, 100% (32/32); and distant sites, 100% (29/29).CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive value of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 on posttreatment PET/CT is relatively low. Thus, Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 findings should be confirmed with tissue sampling before instituting new salvage treatment regimens to avoid unnecessary overtreatment and its associated toxicities. Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 reliably indicates recurrent disease.AJCCAmerican Joint Committee on CancerDdistant sitesHNSCChead and neck squamous cell carcinomaHPVhuman papillomavirusNregional nodesNI-RADSNeck Imaging Reporting and Data SystemPprimary sitePPVpositive predictive value