TABLE 3:

Results of previous outcome measure studies

StudynInstrumentResult
Zoarski et al (18)30 patients, 54 fracturesMODEMS (includes SF-36)Improvement in all 4 MODEMS modules (P < .0001, P < .0001, P < .0004, P < .0009)
Perez-Higueras et al (19)13 patients, 37 fracturesMcGill-Melzack Pain QuestionnaireImprovement in scores following treatment (P < .001), but worsening at follow-up (mean of 65 months)
Legroux-Gerot et al (12)16 patients, 21 fracturesMcGill-Melzack Pain QuestionnaireDecrease in scores at 6 months with no change through maximal follow-up (mean of 35 months) (P < .05)
Nottingham Health ProfileDecrease in quality of life (P = .05); increase in social isolation (P < .05), otherwise no change
Cortet et al (20)16 patients, 20 fracturesMcGill-Melzack Pain QuestionnaireDecrease in score at days 3, 30, 90, and 180 (all P < .005)
Health ProfileDecrease in 5 of 6 dimensions (P < .001, P < .05, P < .05, P < .05), not sleep
Winking et al (14)38 patientsODIDecrease in mean score at day 2, which persisted to 6 weeks (P < .01)
  • Note.—MODEMS indicates Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management Scale; ODI, Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.