Table 2:

The presence of specific MR imaging findings at baseline and follow-up MR imaging

MR Imaging FindingsBaseline (n = 33)Follow-Up (n = 33)*P
≥1 level involved3 (9)4 (12)1
Disk space enhancement22 (67)25/32 (78).29
T2 disk space abnormality29 (88)24 (73).13
Epidural enhancement29 (88)19/32 (59).008
Canal abscess17 (52)3/32 (9).001
Canal compromise (%)
    >25%19 (58)10/32 (31).008
    >50%7 (21)3/32 (9).22
Paraspinal abscess7 (21)5/32 (16)1
Paraspinal inflammation
    None12 (36)12/32 (38)
    Mild18 (55)17/32 (53).75
    Moderate2 (6)3/32 (9)
    Severe1 (3)0
Vertebral body enhancement
    None1 (3)2 (6)
    1%–33%5 (15)5 (15)1
    34%–66%7 (21)4 (12)
    >66%20 (61)22 (66)
Vertebral marrow edema
    None1 (3)1 (3).80
    1%–33%3 (9)5 (15)
    34%–66%10 (30)4 (12)
    >66%19 (58)23 (70)
Vertebral body loss of height
    None19 (53)7 (21)
    1%–33%10 (30)18 (55)<.001
    34%–66%3 (9)2 (6)
    >66%1 (3)6 (18)
  • Note:—Values represent No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.

  • * One patient did not receive contrast on the follow-up MR imaging, thereby limiting the evaluation of epidural, paraspinal, and disk space enhancement.

  • Baseline MRI vs follow-up MRI.