Table 4:

The presence of specific follow-up MR imaging findings by clinical status

MR Imaging FindingsClinically Improved (n = 23)Not Clinically Improved* (n = 10)P
≥1 level involved4 (17)0 (0).29
Disk space enhancement17 (74)8/9 (89).64
T2 disk space abnormality15 (65)9 (90).22
Epidural enhancement13 (57)6/9 (67).70
Canal abscess2 (9)1 (10)1
Canal compromise (%)
    >25%7 (30)3/9 (33)1
    >50%3 (13)0/9 (0).54
Paraspinal abscess3 (13)2/9 (22).60
Paraspinal inflammation
    None10 (43)2/9 (22)
    Mild11 (48)6/9 (67)
    Moderate2 (9)1/9 (11).32
    Severe00
Vertebral body enhancement
    None2 (9)0
    1%–33%4 (17)1 (10).61
    34%–66%2 (9)2 (20)
    >66%15 (65)7 (70)
Vertebral marrow edema
    None1 (4)0
    1%–33%4 (17)1 (10).83
    34%–66%2 (9)2 (20)
    >66%16 (70)7 (70)
Vertebral body loss of height
    None7 (30)0
    1%–33%10 (43)8 (80).42
    34%–66%1 (4)1 (10)
    >66%5 (22)1 (10)
  • Note:—One patient did not receive contrast on the follow-up MR imaging, thereby limiting evaluation of epidural, paraspinal, and disk space enhancement.

  • * Unless otherwise specified.