Table 1:

Summary of the major endovascular stroke therapy trials

TrialDesignBaselineRecanalization RatesGood Clinical OutcomeMortalitySICH
NIHSS(90-day mRS ≤ 2)
RxCtrlRxCtrlRxCtrlRxCtrlRxCtrl
PROACT II*(n = 180) (IAT, 121)RCT, IA pro-UK + IV heparin vs IV heparin171766%18%40%25%25%27%10%2%
MELT Japan (n = 114), (IAT, 57)RCT, IA UK vs medical treatment141473.7%49.1%38.6%5.3%3.5%9%2%
IMS I (n = 80), (IAT, 62)POL, IV rtPA + IA rtPA1856%43%16%6.3%
IMS II (n = 81) (IAT, 55)POL, IV rtPA + IA rtPA/EKOS1958%46%16%9.9%
MERCI (n = 141)POL, IA MERCI, IA lytics allowed, IV disallowed2060.3%27.7%43.5%7.8%
48%
Multi MERCI (n = 164)POL, IA MERCI, IA + IV lytics allowed1968%36%34%9.8%, PH-2: 2.4%
55%
Penumbra (n = 125)POL, IA Penumbra, IA lytics allowed1781.6%25%32.8%11.2%, PH-2: 1.6%
  • Note:—Rx indicates treatment; Ctrl, control; RCT, randomized controlled trial; EKOS, EKOS MicroLysUS infusion catheter; PH, parenchymal hematoma; POL, prospective open-label study; IAT: number of patients treated with IAT; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; SICH, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; IA, intra-arterial; IV, intravenous; UK, urokinase; rtPA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

  • * Primary end point (90-day mRS ≤2) was reached (P = .04).

  • Secondary end point (90-day mRS ≤1) was reached (42.1% vs 22.8%, P = .045).

  • Device alone.