Table 1:

For the diagnosis of paraganglioma, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of each reader for both techniques

Reader 1Reader 2Reader 3Consensus
Sensitivity, %
    C MRI94.1 (80.32–99.28)94.1 (80.32–99.28)91.1 (76.32–98.14)94 (80.32–99.28)
    CE-MRA97 (84.67–99.93)94.1 (80.32–99.28)97 (84.67–99.93)100 (89.72–100)
Specificity, %
    C MRI47 (22.98–72.19)35.2* (14.21–61.67)52.9 (27.81–77.02)41 (18.44–67.08)
    CE-MRA76.4 (50.1–93.19)88.2* (63.56–98.54)88.2 (63.56–98.54)94 (71.31–99.85)
PPV, %
    C MRI78 (62.39–89.44)74.4 (58.83–86.48)79.5 (63.54–90.7)76.2 (60.55–87.95)
    CE-MRA89.2 (74.58–96.97)94.1 (80.32–99.28)94.3 (80.84–99.3)97.1 (85.08–99.93)
NPV, %
    C MRI80 (44.39–97.48)75 (34.91–96.81)75 (42.81–94.51)77.8 (39.99–97.19)
    CE-MRA92.9 (66.13–99.82)88.2 (63.56–98.54)93.8 (69.77–99.84)100 (79.41–100)
Accuracy, %
    C MRI78.4 (44.39–97.48)74.5 (34.91–96.81)78.4 (42.81–94.51)76.5 (39.99–97.19)
    CE-MRA90.2 (66.13–99.82)92.1 (63.56–98.54)94.1 (69.77–99.84)98 (79.41–100)
  • Note:—C MRI indicates conventional MR imaging; in parenthesis, 95% CIs; CE-MRA, contrast-enhanced MR angiography; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

  • *‡ CE-MRA performed significantly superior compared with conventional MR Imaging.

  • * P = .012.

  • P = .031.

  • P = .004.