How credible is the subgroup finding?

Questions
Is the subgroup variable a characteristic specified at the time of the design of the study?
Was the correct direction of the subgroup effect (favorable or unfavorable to treatment for example) specified a priori?
Is the significant interaction effect independent of other potential subgroup effects?
Does the interaction test suggest a low likelihood that chance can explain the apparent subgroup effect?
Was the subgroup effect 1 of a small number of hypothesized effects tested? (The greater the number of hypotheses tested, the greater the number of subgroup effects one will discover by chance.)
Is the magnitude of the subgroup effect large?
Is the interaction consistent across closely related outcomes within the study?
Is the interaction consistent across studies?
Are the subgroup effects plausible? Is there a biologic rationale?