Table 2:

Differences in MRI measurements between 36 patients with IH and 36 controlsa

Diameter of the ONS (mm)bPituitary Height (mm)SOV Diameter (mm)
Position 1Position 2Position 3Position 4
Patients with IH (all, n = 36)Mean7.06.15.45.13.12.3
SD0.90.91.00.71.60.7
95% CI6.7–7.35.8–6.45.1–5.74.9–5.32.6–3.62.0–2.5
ICC0.8320.840.8660.840.8630.389
Patient subgroup I (n = 12)Mean7.26.25.35.13.22.2
    CSF pressure 22–38 cm H2OSD0.60.71.10.51.00.8
Patient subgroup II (n = 10)Mean6.75.95.25.12.82.4
    CSF pressure 40–70 cm H2OSD0.60.70.80.71.30.5
Patient subgroup III (n = 14)Mean7.06.25.75.03.22.2
    No CSF pressure measurementsSD1.21.11.00.82.00.7
Controls (n = 36)Mean5.84.94.44.15.21.7
SD0.60.60.50.31.50.5
95% CI5.6–6.04.7–5.14.3–4.64.0–4.34.7–5.61.5–1.8
ICC0.760.7280.780.7320.8930.634
  • a Results of all measurements differed significantly between all patients and controls (P < .01) and also between the different patient subgroups (I∼III) and controls (P < .05). No significant differences existed among results of patient subgroups I, II, and III.

  • b ONS diameter was measured 3, 6, 10, and 20 mm behind the globe (positions 1–4).