Table 2:

Comparison (n = 85) of baseline features that develop a new surface disruption at follow-up versus lesions whose surface remains intact

Univariate RegressionIndependent t Test or Fisher Exact Test
OR (95% CI)AUC (95% CI)Present (n = 9)Absent (n = 76)P Value
Minimal lumen area (mm2)3.7 per 5-mm2 decrease (1.6–8.7)0.87 (0.77–0.97)8.9 ± 4.520.3 ± 10.5<.001
Percentage wall volume2.6 per 5% increase (1.5–4.6)0.85 (0.71–0.98)62.5 ± 8.950.6 ± 7.2<.001
Percentage LRNC volume2.6 per 5% increase (1.5–4.4)0.95 (0.90–1.00)16.2 ± 11.31.6 ± 4.4.005
Prevalence of LRNC (%)a0.86 (0.77–0.94)10028.9<.001
Prevalence of IPH (%)12.3 for presence of IPH (2.7–56.8)0.73 (0.53–0.94)55.69.2.55
  • a OR (95% CI) could not be calculated because 100% of lesions with a new surface disruption had an LRNC at baseline.