Table 2:

Results of the quantitative analysis

ROIaGMWMSuspected PenumbraSuspected Core
AbsoluteAbsoluteRelativeAbsoluteRelativeAbsolute
CBFDC(mL/100 g/min)65 ± 4.730 ± 2.7.48 ± .1129 ± 6.6.21 ± .0812 ± 4.2
CBFMS (mL/100 g/min)61 ± 2.429 ± 1.7.59 ± .1232 ± 6.2.18 ± .089 ± 4.0
Relative difference DC-MS+6%b+5%b−.11b−12%b+.03b+24%b
Bland-Altman plot slopeYescYescNoNoNoNo
Potentially relevant differences5%5%17%7%10%10%
CBVDC (mL/100 g)3.5 ± .21.9 ± .2.92 ± .162.9 ± .6.37 ± .151.1 ± .44
CBVMS (mL/100 g)3.6 ± .21.9 ± .1.80 ± .112.6 ± .3.30 ± .12.9 ± 0.35
Relative difference DC-MS−4%b−2%+.12b+11%b+.17b+20%b
Bland-Altman plot slopeYescYescYescYescYescYesc
Potentially relevant differences7%5%26%12%12%14%
MTT3.3 ± .3s4.0 ± .6s2.3 ± .677.6 ± 2.2s2.1 ± .666.9 ± 2.1s
TTD3.7 ± .6s4.8 ± 1.0s2.9 ± .8710.6 ± 3.1s3.7 ± 1.013.1 ± 3.5s
TTP8.1 ± 2.4s9.3 ± 2.5s1.7 ± .3313.4 ± 3.3s1.8 ± .3714.2 ± 3.7s
  • a ROI values are mean ± SD.

  • b Statistically significant difference of DC and MS medians (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < .05).

  • c Statistically significant relationship of the method difference (DC − MS) versus the size of the measurement (DC + MS)/2 (Wilcoxon test, P < .05). “Yes” indicates a proportional difference; “no” indicates a systematic nonproportional or random difference.