TABLE

Demographics and imaging results

Patient No./Sex/Age (y)Histologic DiagnosisTumor LocationUSPIOIron UptakeT1 Signal Intensity ChangeT2 Signal Intensity Change
1/F/48Metastatic large cell carcinomaCerebellumFerumoxides
2/M/46Anaplastic oligodendragliomaR temporoparietalFerumoxides+*+
3/F/53MeningiomaL frontalFerumoxides
4/M/54Gliblastoma multiformeL thalamus, parietalFerumoxtran-10+++
5/M/55Anaplastic oligodendragliomaL temporalFerumoxtran-10+++
6/M/54OligodendrogliomaL frontotemporalFerumoxtran-10
7/F/47HamartomaL temporalFerumoxtran-10+*+
8/F/30MedulloblastomaCerebellumFerumoxtran-10+++
9/M/58Anaplastic oligodendragliomaR temporoparietalFerumoxtran-10+++
10/M/55Squamous cell carcinomaNasopharynx with skull base invasionFerumoxtran-10+++
11/M/50Squamous cell carcinomaNasopharynx with skull base invasionFerumoxtran-10+++
12/F/42MeningiomaL petroclivalFerumoxtran-10+++
13/M/57OligodendrogliomaR parietalFerumoxtran-10
14/M/55Anaplastic gliomaL temporalFerumoxtran-10+*+
15/F/54Glioblastoma multiformeR temporoparietalFerumoxtran-10+++
16/F/66Glioblastoma multiformeR frontalFerumoxtran-10+++
17/F/57Anaplastic oligodendragliomaR frontalFerumoxtran-10+++
18/M/54Pituitary adenomaIntra- and suprasellarFerumoxtran-10+++
19/M/39Glioblastoma multiformeL fronto-opercularFerumoxtran-10+++
20/M/46Anaplastic oligodendragliomaR posterior temporalFerumoxtran-10+++
  • Note.—L indicates left; R, right; +, yes; −, no.

  • * Iron accumulation was only minimal compared with gadolinium enhancement.

  • Ferumoxtran enhancement as measured with ROI (see Methods) was regionally more prominent than gadolinium enhancement.