Patient and Stage of Angiographic Data Collection | Speed, fps | Total No. of Frames |
---|---|---|
Patient 1* | ||
Before stent | 15 | 84 |
After stent | 15 | 110 |
Follow-up at 24 h | 15 | 137 |
Patient 2† | ||
No endovascular prostheses | 5 | 18 |
One stent | 5 | 20 |
One stent and coils | 5 | 19 |
One stent and coils, after 2 mo | 15 | 52 |
Two stents and coils | 15 | 43 |
Patient 3‡ | ||
Before stent | 5 | 20 |
After stent | 5 | 29 |
Patient 4§ | ||
Before stent | 15 | 59 |
After stent | 15 | 110 |
Patient 5‖ | ||
Before stent | 5 | 14 |
After stent | 5 | 14 |
* Patient 1 had a fusiform aneurysm at the vertebrobasilar junction that was treated with a Magic S/P Wallstent, 4 × 47 mm (Boston Scientific).
† Patient 2 had a fusiform basilar trunk aneurysm that was treated with a S670 stent, 3.5 × 18 mm (Medtronic).
‡ Patient 3 had a fusiform aneurysm at the vertebrobasilar junction that was treated with a Dynalink stent, 6 × 38 mm (Guidant).
§ Patient 4 had a carotid-ophthalmic bifurcation aneurysm that was treated with an S7 AVE stent, 3.5 × 12 mm (Medtronic).
‖ Patient 5 had a wide-necked posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm that was treated with an S7 AVE stent, 3.5 × 9 mm (Medtronic).