Table 2:

Regional correlation of DWI and GBM cellular characteristics

	Track Density	Logistic Regression P Value	False Discovery Rate P Value	Relative Track Density	Logistic Regression PValue	False Discovery Rate P Value
Nonenhancing Tissue Specimens
Tumor	0.20	.54	.85	0.21	.52	.52
Hypoxia	0.14	.67	.85	0.55	.02^*	.05^*
Infiltration	0.06	.85	.85	0.47	.05^*	.07
Contrast-Enhancing Tissue Specimens
Tumor	0.08	.72	.89	0.32	.12	.12
Infiltration	0.35	.09	.45	0.34	.09	.11
Hypoxia	0.03	.89	.89	0.65	.01^*	.05^*
Hyperplasia	0.10	.65	.89	0.45	.02^*	.05^*
Proliferation	0.08	.70	.89	0.39	.05^*	.08

Note:—Correlation analysis of tissue specimens is stratified into enhancing or nonenhancing groups (N = 36). The correlation between track density and vascular hyperplasia and cellular proliferation was not examined within nonenhancing regions, as these are not typical biological features within this region.⁹
↵* P value <.05 is considered statistically significant.