Table 2:

Analysis of classification errors: out-of-sample setsa

MS vs HCMS vs ONDOND vs HC
Sen %78.8591.1140
95% CI (Sen)67.75–89.9582.80–99.439.64–70.36
Spe %59.2635.2959.26
95% CI (Spe)40.73–77.7912.58–58.0140.73–77.79
FP %40.7464.7140.74
95% CI (FP)22.21–59.2741.99–87.4222.21–59.27
FN %21.158.8960
95% CI (FN)10.05–32.250.57–17.2029.64–90.36
PPV %78.8578.8526.67
95% CI (PPV)67.75–89.9567.75–89.954.29–49.05
NPV %59.266072.73
95% CI (NPV)40.73–77.7929.64–90.3654.12–91.34
OR5.425.590.97
95% CI (OR)1.95–14.971.34–23.340.22–4.26
  • Note:—Sen indicates sensitivity; Spe, specificity; FP, false-positive; FN, false-negative; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

  • a The columns refer to each comparison between the groups in the independent samples.