Table 1:

Correlation between manual and estimated coverage values for the construct pictured in Fig 5a

3.5-mm-Vessel Manual SegmentationManualEstimated
3.75 PED22%
3.75 + 4.25 PED36%–37%36%–37%
4.25 PED18%–19%
  • a Manual segmentation was done by tracing curved lines over each braid in the double-coverage area and comparing the result with values estimated by overlapping segmented images from separate 3.75- and 4.25-mm devices individually deployed within a 3.5-mm artificial vessel. The 2 methods are in excellent agreement.