Summary of attempted stenting
| Age (yr), Sex | Aneurysm Location | Aneurysms Treated during the Procedure | Stents | Event | Final Result | F/U | mRS Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50, F | MCA | 1 | 0 | Sac perforation with the guidewire | C | – | 0 |
| 62, F | MCA | 1 | 0 | Sac perforation with the microdelivery stent system and exchange guidewire | A | – | 4 |
| 70, F | MCA | 2 | 1 | First stent was delivered too distally, with the proximal end covering the neck; impossible to navigate the microcatheter in the second branch | C, C | B, B | 0 |
| 38, M | AcomA | 1 | 1 | Guidewire tip broke in the parent vessel and a single stent was delivered due to the impossibility of navigating the microcatheter in the second branch | C | A | 0 |
| 48, F | MCA | 1 | 2 | First stent was delivered too distally, no overlapping | C | C | 0 |
| 30, F | AcomA | 1 | 2 | First stent was delivered too distally, no overlapping | B | A | 0 |
| 86, F | BA | 1 | 2 | First stent fell into aneurysmal sac, no overlapping | C | C | 2 |
| 51, F | CT | 1 | 2 | First stent fell into aneurysmal sac, no overlapping | C | – | 0 |
| 58, F | AcomA | 2 | 2 | Second stent was deployed inside the first one (coaxial) | C, C | C, C | 0 |
Note:—F/U indicates follow-up; BA, basilar artery; CT, carotid termination; A, complete occlusion; B, neck remnant; C, sac remnant.